Problems of the human factor in transport systems

dc.citation.epage43
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage31
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.authorMygal, Galyna
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-27T09:07:53Z
dc.date.available2024-06-27T09:07:53Z
dc.date.created2024-02-28
dc.date.issued2024-02-28
dc.description.abstractСтатистика аварій у сфері транспорту та практичні результати у сфері безпеки вказують на те, що без вирішення проблематики людського чинника технологічні рішення не здатні забезпечити життєздатність (безпеку, стійкість, надійність та ефективність) складних систем та структур. Особливо гостра ця проблема для транспортних систем як надзвичайно складних технологічно-соціальних структур, що орієнтовані на забезпечення ефективності та безпеки цілої сфери життя людства. У транспортних системах та технологіях людський чинник відіграє критичну роль. Успішне функціонування транспортних систем потребує врахування людського чинника на всіх рівнях – від розроблення, проєктування та планування систем і технологій, від навчання та освіти до залучення суспільства до процесів прийняття рішень. Тому актуальними є розвиток концепції управління людським чинником та аналіз основних проблем у транспортних системах, що пов’язані з людським чинником, з метою підвищення безпеки, надійності та ефективності їх функціонування. У статті проаналізовано проблеми людського чинника в транспортних системах та пошуку рішень щодо управління ним. Метою статті є аналіз основних проблем у транспортних системах, що пов’язані з людським чинником, та розвиток концепції управління людським чинником для подальшого пошуку рішень щодо підвищення безпеки і надійності транспортних систем. Для досягнення мети та вирішення поставлених завдань у дослідженні запропоновано набір інструментів. Проаналізовано основні проблеми транспортних систем, що пов’язані із людським чинником. Систематизовано основні напрями вирішення проблем впливу людського чинника на безпеку транспортних систем. Викладено головні засади, модель та шляхи розвитку концепції управління проблемою людського чинника в складних системах, до яких належать транспортні. Запропоновано систематизацію стратегії управління ризиками, матрицю взаємозв’язку стратегій управління ризиками та підходами до управління безпекою складних систем. Запропоновано новий погляд на принцип адаптивної ергономічності як реалізацію стратегії толерантності та розглянуто застосування принципу адаптивної ергономічності до транспортних систем. Головною метою роботи є привернення уваги наукової та освітньої спільноти до проблеми людського чинника та необхідності використання концепції управління людським чинником у навчальному процесі для підвищення загальної культури безпеки в суспільстві.
dc.description.abstractTransport accident statistics and practical safety results indicate that technological solutions cannot ensure the viability (safety, sustainability, reliability and efficiency) of complex systems and structures without addressing human factors. This problem is especially acute for transport systems as highly complex technological and social structures aimed at ensuring the efficiency and safety of an entire sphere of human life. In transportation systems and technologies, the human factor plays a critical role. The successful operation of transport systems requires consideration of the human factor at all levels – starting from the development, design and planning of systems and technologies, training and education to the involvement of society in decision-making processes. Therefore, it is essential to develop the concept of human factor management and analyze the main problems in transport systems associated with the human factor to improve the safety, reliability and efficiency of their functioning. The article is devoted to the analysis of the human factor problem in transport systems and the search for solutions to manage it. The purpose of the article is to analyze the main problems in transport systems associated with the human factor and to develop the concept of human factor management for further search for solutions to improve the safety and reliability of transport systems. A set of instruments was proposed in the study to achieve the goal and solve the set tasks. Problems connected to the human factor in transport systems were analyzed. The main directions for solving problems with the influence of the human factor on the safety of transport systems were systematized. The main principles, models and ways of developing the concept of managing the human factor problem in complex systems, including transport, were outlined. A systematization of the risk management strategy was proposed. A matrix for the relationship between risk management strategies and approaches to managing the safety of complex systems was proposed. A new look at the principle of adaptive ergonomics as an implementation of the tolerance strategy was proposed, and applying the principle of adaptive ergonomics to transport systems was considered. The main motivation of the work is to attract the attention of the scientific and educational community to the problem of human factor and the need to use the concept of human factor management in the educational process to improve the general safety culture in society.
dc.format.extent31-43
dc.format.pages13
dc.identifier.citationMygal G. Problems of the human factor in transport systems / Galyna Mygal // Transport Technologies. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2024. — Vol 5. — No 1. — P. 31–43.
dc.identifier.citationenMygal G. Problems of the human factor in transport systems / Galyna Mygal // Transport Technologies. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2024. — Vol 5. — No 1. — P. 31–43.
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.23939/tt2024.01.031
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/62292
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherВидавництво Львівської політехніки
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofTransport Technologies, 1 (5), 2024
dc.relation.references1. Dul, J., Bruder, R., Buckle, P., Carayon, P., Falzon, P., Marras, W. S., ... & Van der Doelen, B. (2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 55(4), 377-395. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.661087 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.661087
dc.relation.references2. Reiman, A., Kaivo-oja, J., Parviainen, E., Takala, E. P., & Lauraeus, T. (2021). Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing in the industry 4.0 context-A scoping review. Technology in Society, 65, 101572. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101572 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101572
dc.relation.references3. Lee, J. D., Wickens, C. D., Liu, Y. & Boyle, L. N. (2017). Designing for People: An introduction to human factors engineering. Charleston, SC: CreateSpace, 692 p. (in English).
dc.relation.references4. Mygal, V. P., Mygal, G. V. & Mygal, S. P. (2021). Transdisciplinary convergent approach - human factor. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems, Modelling and digitalization, 4(100), 7-21. doi: 10.32620/reks.2021.4.01 (in English). https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2021.4.01
dc.relation.references5. Mehta, R. K., & Parasuraman, R. (2013). Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 889. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889 (in English). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889
dc.relation.references6. Fedota, J. R., & Parasuraman, R. (2010). Neuroergonomics and human error. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(5), 402-421. doi: 10.1080/14639220902853104 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220902853104
dc.relation.references7. Rantanen, E., Boehm-Davis, D., Boyle, L. N., Hannon, D., & Lee, J. D. (2016). Education of future human factors professionals. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 6(1), (pp. 418-421). doi: 10.1177/1541931213601094 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601094
dc.relation.references8. Mygal, V., Mygal, G., & Mygal, S. (2022). Cognitive Space for Online and Offline Learning: A Convergent Approach. The Educational Review, USA, 6(4), 109-123. doi: 10.26855/er.2022.04.001 (in English). https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2022.04.001
dc.relation.references9. Mygal, V., Mygal, G., & Mygal, S. (2023). Strategy for the development of design education in post-war Ukraine: transdisciplinary approach. SA, 5(2), 119-129. doi: 10.23939/sa. (in English). https://doi.org/10.23939/sa
dc.relation.references10. Mygal, G., & Protasenko, O. (2023). Designing human-machine systems: transformation of a designer's thinking. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu «KhPI». Seriia: Novi rishennia u suchasnykh tekhnolohiiakh [Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Series: New solutions in modern technology], 4 (18). 27-35. doi:10.20998/2413-4295.2022.04.01 (in English). https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-4295.2022.04.01
dc.relation.references11. Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A Review of Its Origins, Development, and Current. Retrieved from: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/kb_pubs/37/ (in English).
dc.relation.references12. Patnaik, Dev. (2023). Forget Design Thinking and Try Hybrid Thinking. Retrieved from: https://www.jumpassociates.com/forget-design-thinking-and-try-hybrid-thi... (in English).
dc.relation.references13. Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing . Springer London. (in English).
dc.relation.references14. Meister, D. (1989). Conceptual Aspects of Human Factors. Baltimore and London, The J. Hopkins University Press (in English).
dc.relation.references15. Serdiuk S. M. (2014). Erhonomichni pytannia proektuvannia liudyno-mashynnykh system [Ergonomic issues of designing man-machine systems]. Zaporizhzhia: ZNTU (in Ukrainian)
dc.relation.references16. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human factors, 39(2), 230-253. doi: 10.1518/001872097778543886 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886
dc.relation.references17. Mygal, V., Mygal, G., & Mygal, S. (2023). Actual problems of creative activity and new cognitive possibilities: a transdisciplinary approach. Retrieved from: https://www.qeios.com/read/GIJ3RI.3 (in English). https://doi.org/10.32388/GIJ3RI.3
dc.relation.references18. Marshall, P., Hirmas, A., & Singer, M. (2018). Heinrich's pyramid and occupational safety: a statistical validation methodology. Safety science, 101, 180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.005. (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.005
dc.relation.references19. Zgurovsky, M.Z., Pankratova, N.D. (2007). System analysys: theory and application. Berlin: Springer (in English).
dc.relation.references20. Pankratova, N., Malishevsky, A., & Pankratov, V. (2022). Cyber-Physical Systems Operation with Guaranteed Survivability and Safety Under Conditions of Uncertainty and Multifactor Risks. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-94910-5_2 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94910-5_2
dc.relation.references21. Passino, K. М. (2005). Biomimicry for Optimization, Control, and Automation. Springer-Verlag London. doi: 10.1007/b138169. (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/b138169
dc.relation.references22. Mygal, G., Mygal, V., Protasenko, O., & Klymenko, I. (2022). Cognitive aspects of ensuring the safety, dependability and stability of a dynamic system's functioning in extreme conditions. In Conference on Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering-Synergetic Engineering (pp. 195-206). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94259-5_18 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94259-5_18
dc.relation.references23. Mygal, G., Protasenko, O., Kobrina, N., & Mykhailova, E. (2023). Ergonomic thinking in the design of human-machine systems. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu «KhPI». Seriia: Novi rishennia v suchasnykh tekhnolohiiakh [Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Series: New solutions in modern technology], 1(15), 42-52. doi: 10.20998/2413-4295.2023.01.06 (in English). https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-4295.2023.01.06
dc.relation.references24. Wilson, J. R. (2014). Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. Applied ergonomics, 45(1), 5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.021. (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.021
dc.relation.references25. Hancock, P. A., & Drury, C. G. (2011). Does human factors/ergonomics contribute to the quality of life?. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 12(5), 416-426. doi: 10.1080/1464536X.2011.559293 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/1464536X.2011.559293
dc.relation.referencesen1. Dul, J., Bruder, R., Buckle, P., Carayon, P., Falzon, P., Marras, W. S., ... & Van der Doelen, B. (2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 55(4), 377-395. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.661087 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.661087
dc.relation.referencesen2. Reiman, A., Kaivo-oja, J., Parviainen, E., Takala, E. P., & Lauraeus, T. (2021). Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing in the industry 4.0 context-A scoping review. Technology in Society, 65, 101572. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101572 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101572
dc.relation.referencesen3. Lee, J. D., Wickens, C. D., Liu, Y. & Boyle, L. N. (2017). Designing for People: An introduction to human factors engineering. Charleston, SC: CreateSpace, 692 p. (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen4. Mygal, V. P., Mygal, G. V. & Mygal, S. P. (2021). Transdisciplinary convergent approach - human factor. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems, Modelling and digitalization, 4(100), 7-21. doi: 10.32620/reks.2021.4.01 (in English). https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2021.4.01
dc.relation.referencesen5. Mehta, R. K., & Parasuraman, R. (2013). Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 889. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889 (in English). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889
dc.relation.referencesen6. Fedota, J. R., & Parasuraman, R. (2010). Neuroergonomics and human error. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(5), 402-421. doi: 10.1080/14639220902853104 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220902853104
dc.relation.referencesen7. Rantanen, E., Boehm-Davis, D., Boyle, L. N., Hannon, D., & Lee, J. D. (2016). Education of future human factors professionals. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 6(1), (pp. 418-421). doi: 10.1177/1541931213601094 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601094
dc.relation.referencesen8. Mygal, V., Mygal, G., & Mygal, S. (2022). Cognitive Space for Online and Offline Learning: A Convergent Approach. The Educational Review, USA, 6(4), 109-123. doi: 10.26855/er.2022.04.001 (in English). https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2022.04.001
dc.relation.referencesen9. Mygal, V., Mygal, G., & Mygal, S. (2023). Strategy for the development of design education in post-war Ukraine: transdisciplinary approach. SA, 5(2), 119-129. doi: 10.23939/sa. (in English). https://doi.org/10.23939/sa
dc.relation.referencesen10. Mygal, G., & Protasenko, O. (2023). Designing human-machine systems: transformation of a designer's thinking. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu "KhPI". Seriia: Novi rishennia u suchasnykh tekhnolohiiakh [Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Series: New solutions in modern technology], 4 (18). 27-35. doi:10.20998/2413-4295.2022.04.01 (in English). https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-4295.2022.04.01
dc.relation.referencesen11. Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A Review of Its Origins, Development, and Current. Retrieved from: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/kb_pubs/37/ (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen12. Patnaik, Dev. (2023). Forget Design Thinking and Try Hybrid Thinking. Retrieved from: https://www.jumpassociates.com/forget-design-thinking-and-try-hybrid-thi... (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen13. Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing . Springer London. (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen14. Meister, D. (1989). Conceptual Aspects of Human Factors. Baltimore and London, The J. Hopkins University Press (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen15. Serdiuk S. M. (2014). Erhonomichni pytannia proektuvannia liudyno-mashynnykh system [Ergonomic issues of designing man-machine systems]. Zaporizhzhia: ZNTU (in Ukrainian)
dc.relation.referencesen16. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human factors, 39(2), 230-253. doi: 10.1518/001872097778543886 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886
dc.relation.referencesen17. Mygal, V., Mygal, G., & Mygal, S. (2023). Actual problems of creative activity and new cognitive possibilities: a transdisciplinary approach. Retrieved from: https://www.qeios.com/read/GIJ3RI.3 (in English). https://doi.org/10.32388/GIJ3RI.3
dc.relation.referencesen18. Marshall, P., Hirmas, A., & Singer, M. (2018). Heinrich's pyramid and occupational safety: a statistical validation methodology. Safety science, 101, 180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.005. (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.005
dc.relation.referencesen19. Zgurovsky, M.Z., Pankratova, N.D. (2007). System analysys: theory and application. Berlin: Springer (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen20. Pankratova, N., Malishevsky, A., & Pankratov, V. (2022). Cyber-Physical Systems Operation with Guaranteed Survivability and Safety Under Conditions of Uncertainty and Multifactor Risks. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-94910-5_2 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94910-5_2
dc.relation.referencesen21. Passino, K. M. (2005). Biomimicry for Optimization, Control, and Automation. Springer-Verlag London. doi: 10.1007/b138169. (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/b138169
dc.relation.referencesen22. Mygal, G., Mygal, V., Protasenko, O., & Klymenko, I. (2022). Cognitive aspects of ensuring the safety, dependability and stability of a dynamic system's functioning in extreme conditions. In Conference on Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering-Synergetic Engineering (pp. 195-206). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94259-5_18 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94259-5_18
dc.relation.referencesen23. Mygal, G., Protasenko, O., Kobrina, N., & Mykhailova, E. (2023). Ergonomic thinking in the design of human-machine systems. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu "KhPI". Seriia: Novi rishennia v suchasnykh tekhnolohiiakh [Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Series: New solutions in modern technology], 1(15), 42-52. doi: 10.20998/2413-4295.2023.01.06 (in English). https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-4295.2023.01.06
dc.relation.referencesen24. Wilson, J. R. (2014). Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. Applied ergonomics, 45(1), 5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.021. (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.021
dc.relation.referencesen25. Hancock, P. A., & Drury, C. G. (2011). Does human factors/ergonomics contribute to the quality of life?. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 12(5), 416-426. doi: 10.1080/1464536X.2011.559293 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/1464536X.2011.559293
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.661087
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101572
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2021.4.01
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14639220902853104
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601094
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.26855/er.2022.04.001
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.23939/sa
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.20998/2413-4295.2022.04.01
dc.relation.urihttps://academicworks.cuny.edu/kb_pubs/37/
dc.relation.urihttps://www.jumpassociates.com/forget-design-thinking-and-try-hybrid-thi..
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886
dc.relation.urihttps://www.qeios.com/read/GIJ3RI.3
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.32388/GIJ3RI.3
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.005
dc.relation.urihttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-94910-5_2
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94910-5_2
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/b138169
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94259-5_18
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.20998/2413-4295.2023.01.06
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.021
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/1464536X.2011.559293
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2024
dc.rights.holder© G. Mygal, 2024
dc.subjectлюдський чинник
dc.subjectтранспортні системи
dc.subjectбезпека
dc.subjectжиттєздатність
dc.subjectстратегії управління ризиками
dc.subjectконцепція управління людським чинником
dc.subjecthuman factor
dc.subjecttransport systems
dc.subjectsafety
dc.subjectviability
dc.subjectrisk management strategy
dc.subjecthuman factor management concept
dc.titleProblems of the human factor in transport systems
dc.title.alternativeПроблеми людського чинника в транспортних системах
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2024v5n1_Mygal_G-Problems_of_the_human_factor_31-43.pdf
Size:
339.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2024v5n1_Mygal_G-Problems_of_the_human_factor_31-43__COVER.png
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.74 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: