Classification of agricultural elements used in buildings

dc.citation.epage117
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.journalTitleАрхітектурні дослідження
dc.citation.spage106
dc.contributor.affiliationНаціональний університет «Львівська політехніка»
dc.contributor.affiliationНаціональний університет «Львівська політехніка»
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.authorРубай, Роман
dc.contributor.authorГнат, Галина
dc.contributor.authorRubai, Roman
dc.contributor.authorHnat, Halyna
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-24T12:02:57Z
dc.date.created2025-04-10
dc.date.issued2025-04-10
dc.description.abstractДослідження було присвячене проблемі використання елементів агровиробництва та прикладного озеленення в структурі будівлі, оскільки сучасні науково-практичні роботи в галузі архітектури або відсутні, або лише дотичні до теми дослідження. Метою даного дослідження було здійснити класифікацію аграрного елемента в структурі споруди для створення бази подальших досліджень в даній тематиці, а також визначити основні характеристики аграрних елементів та встановити їх взаємодії з будівлями. У досліджені використовувалися такі методи, як аналіз літературних та наукових джерел, логічний та декомпозиційний методи, порівняльний аналіз, графоаналітичний метод, формалізація, узагальнення та абстрагування, індукція. В результаті вивчення міждисциплінарних досліджень було виділено три основних можливих способів розрізнення аграрних елементів і/або прикладного озеленення. Це є: «за призначенням», «за моделлю використання», «за розташуванням». Згідно цих характеристик було проведено класифікацію досліджених споруд. Перший клас «за призначенням» позначає основну функцію аграрного елементу в структурі споруди і містить підтипи: комерційний, соціальний та рекреаційний елементи. Другий – «за моделлю використання» – відображає можливості аграрного елемента забезпечувати певну кількість населення своїми зазначеними функціями: для комерції – це потужність виробництва продовольства, для рекреації – її візуальна доступність та кількість людей, що може вона обслужити, у випадку прикладного типу відпочинку. Містить підкласи: загальноміські, районного використання та внутрішньо-будинкові. Третій – «за розташуванням» – вказує на місцезнаходження елементів агровиробництва або озеленення в структурі споруди і містить підкласи «в структурі ділянки» «в структурі будинку» та «в структурі квартири (поверху)». Практична цінність даного дослідження полягає в тому, що отримані результати доповнюють понятійно-термінологічний апарат, та можуть бути використані для створення рекомендацій та методичних вказівок щодо проектування аграрних елементів в споруді
dc.description.abstractThe study addressed the utilisation of agricultural elements and applied landscaping in buildings, as current research in the field of architecture is either absent or only tangentially related to the topic. The study aimed to classify the agricultural element in the building structure to provide a basis for further research in this area, to identify the main characteristics of agricultural elements and to establish their interaction with buildings. The study used analysis of literary and scientific sources, logical, decomposition, comparative analysis, graph-analytical method, formalisation, generalisation and abstraction, and induction. As a result of the interdisciplinary research, three main possible ways of distinguishing between agricultural elements and/or applied landscaping were identified. These are: “by purpose”, “by use model”, and “by location”. The classification of the studied buildings was conducted based on the aforementioned characteristics. The first category, “by purpose”, denotes the primary function of the agricultural element in the structure of the building and includes the following subtypes: commercial, social, and recreational elements. The second “by use model” category reflects a certain function of an agricultural component: for commercial purposes, it is the food production capacity; for recreation, its visual accessibility, and the number of people it can serve in the case of applied recreation. This category includes subclasses: citywide, district use, and in-building. The third category, “by location” denotes the location of agricultural or landscaping elements in the structure of the building and contains subclasses “in the structure of the plot”, “in the structure of the building”, and “in the structure of the apartment (floor)”. The practical value of this study is that the results complement the conceptual and terminological apparatus and can be used to create recommendations and guidelines for designing agricultural elements in the building
dc.format.extent106-117
dc.format.pages12
dc.identifier.citationRubai R. Classification of agricultural elements used in buildings / Roman Rubai, Halyna Hnat // Architectural Studies. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2025. — Vol 11. — No 1. — P. 106–117.
dc.identifier.citation2015Rubai R., Hnat H. Classification of agricultural elements used in buildings // Architectural Studies, Lviv. 2025. Vol 11. No 1. P. 106–117.
dc.identifier.citationenAPARubai, R., & Hnat, H. (2025). Classification of agricultural elements used in buildings. Architectural Studies, 11(1), 106-117. Lviv Politechnic Publishing House..
dc.identifier.citationenCHICAGORubai R., Hnat H. (2025) Classification of agricultural elements used in buildings. Architectural Studies (Lviv), vol. 11, no 1, pp. 106-117.
dc.identifier.doi10.56318/as/1.2025.106
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/121565
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherВидавництво Львівської політехніки
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofАрхітектурні дослідження, 1 (11), 2025
dc.relation.ispartofArchitectural Studies, 1 (11), 2025
dc.relation.references[1] Addas, A. (2024). Optimizing urban green infrastructure using a highly detailed surface modeling approach. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), article number 75. doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00266-7.
dc.relation.references[2] ArchDaily. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com.
dc.relation.references[3] Avdieieva, N., & Zakharov, Yu. (2021). Problems of classification and use of “green structures” in architectural design. International Scientific Journal “Internauka”, 5. doi: 10.25313/2520-2057-2021-5.
dc.relation.references[4] Avling Kitchen and Brewery, Toronto. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://zinco-greenroof.com/references/avling-kitchen-and-brewery-toronto.
dc.relation.references[5] Barron, S., & Rugel, E.J. (2023). Tolerant greenspaces: Designing urban nature-based solutions that foster social ties and support mental health among young adults. Environmental Science & Policy, 139, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.005.
dc.relation.references[6] Basso, S., Bisiani, T., Martorana, P., & Venudo, A. (2023). Vertical farm: New architectures and cities from the forms of agriculture. AGATHÓN – International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 13, 141-152. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/13122023.
dc.relation.references[7] Buravchenko, S., Pyvovarov, O., & Bezpala, L. (2021). Features of integration of plants into architecture in world examples of housing design. Theory and Practice of Design, 24, 124-132. doi: 10.18372/2415-8151.24.16299.
dc.relation.references[8] Chen, D., Wang, Y., & Bao, H. (2024). Sharing or sparing? The trade-offs among urban services, food production and ecosystem services. Habitat International, 147, article number 103037. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103037.
dc.relation.references[9] Cheung, T., Fong, K.H., & Xiang, Y.-T. (2024). The impact of urbanization on youth mental health in Hong Kong. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 37(3), 172-176. doi: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000930.
dc.relation.references[10] Google Docs. (n.d.). Examples of buildings used in the study. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fgUHB7ZCZp6AJWOHQ5CDxVy3rPjghngr69obcqdplr8/edit?usp=sharing.
dc.relation.references[11] Gotham Greens. (n.d.). Our farms. Retrieved from https://www.gothamgreens.com/our-farms/.
dc.relation.references[12] Herrmann, M.M. (2015). The modern day “Victory Garden”. Procedia Engineering, 118, 647-653. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.498.
dc.relation.references[13] Hnes, I., & Ivanochko, U. (2019). Spatial and social aspects of creating the housing environment in big cities. Rocznik Lubuski, 45(2), 51-68. doi: 10.34768/rl.2019.v452.04.
dc.relation.references[14] Kocsis, J.B., & Tomay, K. (2024). Suburban sustainability in Budapest agglomeration – the case of Törökbálint. Sustainability, 16(8), article number 3449. doi: 10.3390/su16083449.
dc.relation.references[15] Komar, B. (2023). Aspern Seestadt in Vienna in the assessment of the urban audit. Housing Environment, 44(3) 25-34. doi: 10.4467/25438700sm.23.019.18480.
dc.relation.references[16] Mensah, J.K. (2023). Stimulating and developing sustainable urban local economies: The role of urban agriculture. Development Southern Africa, 40(5), 1086-1099. doi: 10.1080/0376835x.2023.2177259.
dc.relation.references[17] Miroshnyk, N. (2023). Green infrastructure, urbanization and ecosystem services – relationships in a megalopolis. Factors of Experimental Evolution of Organisms, 33, 135-140. doi: 10.7124/feeo.v33.1581.
dc.relation.references[18] Mougeot, L.J.A. (2005). Agropolis: The social, political, and environmental dimensions of urban agriculture. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.references[19] Panțiru, I., Ronaldson, A., Sima, N., Dregan, A., & Sima, R. (2024). The impact of gardening on well-being, mental health, and quality of life: An umbrella review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 13, article number 45. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02457-9.
dc.relation.references[20] Reed, P. (2021). Physical activity is good for the mind and the body. Retrieved from https://odphp.health.gov/news/202112/physical-activity-good-mind-and-body.
dc.relation.references[21] Rosenfield, K. (2014). SPARK proposes vertical farming hybrid to house Singapore’s aging population. ArchDaily. Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/573783/spark-proposes-vertical-farming-hybrid-to-house-singapore-s-aging-population-2.
dc.relation.references[22] Sarzynski, A., & Vicino, T.J. (2019). Shrinking suburbs: Analyzing the decline of American suburban spaces. Sustainability, 11(19), article number 5230. doi: 10.3390/su11195230.
dc.relation.references[23] Scott, T.L., Masser, B.M., & Pachana, N.A. (2020). Positive aging benefits of home and community gardening activities: Older adults report enhanced self-esteem, productive endeavors, social engagement and exercise. SAGE Open Medicine, 8. doi: 10.1177/2050312120901732.
dc.relation.references[24] SPARK – HOME FARM. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://sparkarchitects.com/work/home-farm.
dc.relation.references[25] Srinivasan, K., & Yadav, V.K. (2024). Fresh bell peppers consumed in cities: Unveiling the environmental impact of urban and rural food supply systems. Science of the Total Environment, 927, article number 172359. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172359.
dc.relation.references[26] Starr, D. (2021). The air investigator. Science, 373(6555), 612-615. doi: 10.1126/science.373.6555.612.
dc.relation.references[27] Sun, C., Wang, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2023). Urbanization and residents’ health: From the perspective of environmental pollution. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 67820-67838. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26979-2.
dc.relation.references[28] Tan, T.H., & Lee, W.C. (2023). Life satisfaction and perceived and objective neighborhood environments in a green-accredited township: Quantile regression approach. Cities, 134, article number 104196. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104196.
dc.relation.references[29] Waldinger, R., & Schulz, M. (2023). The Good life: Lessons from the world’s longest scientific study of happiness. New York: Simon & Schuster.
dc.relation.references[30] Wen, C.P., et al. (2011). Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: A prospective cohort study. Lancet, 378(9798), 1244-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60749-6.
dc.relation.references[31] Whole Foods goes ultra-local with Gotham Greens greenhouse in Brooklyn. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.greenbiz.com/article/whole-foods-goes-ultra-local-gotham-greens-greenhouse-brooklyn.
dc.relation.references[32] Wood Housing Seestadt Aspern / Querkraft + Berger+Parkkinen Architekten. (2020). ArchDaily. Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/950123/wood-housing-seestadt-aspern-berger-plus-parkkinen-architekten-plus-querkraft-architects?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab.
dc.relation.referencesen[1] Addas, A. (2024). Optimizing urban green infrastructure using a highly detailed surface modeling approach. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), article number 75. doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00266-7.
dc.relation.referencesen[2] ArchDaily. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com.
dc.relation.referencesen[3] Avdieieva, N., & Zakharov, Yu. (2021). Problems of classification and use of "green structures" in architectural design. International Scientific Journal "Internauka", 5. doi: 10.25313/2520-2057-2021-5.
dc.relation.referencesen[4] Avling Kitchen and Brewery, Toronto. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://zinco-greenroof.com/references/avling-kitchen-and-brewery-toronto.
dc.relation.referencesen[5] Barron, S., & Rugel, E.J. (2023). Tolerant greenspaces: Designing urban nature-based solutions that foster social ties and support mental health among young adults. Environmental Science & Policy, 139, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.005.
dc.relation.referencesen[6] Basso, S., Bisiani, T., Martorana, P., & Venudo, A. (2023). Vertical farm: New architectures and cities from the forms of agriculture. AGATHÓN – International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 13, 141-152. doi: 10.19229/2464-9309/13122023.
dc.relation.referencesen[7] Buravchenko, S., Pyvovarov, O., & Bezpala, L. (2021). Features of integration of plants into architecture in world examples of housing design. Theory and Practice of Design, 24, 124-132. doi: 10.18372/2415-8151.24.16299.
dc.relation.referencesen[8] Chen, D., Wang, Y., & Bao, H. (2024). Sharing or sparing? The trade-offs among urban services, food production and ecosystem services. Habitat International, 147, article number 103037. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103037.
dc.relation.referencesen[9] Cheung, T., Fong, K.H., & Xiang, Y.-T. (2024). The impact of urbanization on youth mental health in Hong Kong. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 37(3), 172-176. doi: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000930.
dc.relation.referencesen[10] Google Docs. (n.d.). Examples of buildings used in the study. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fgUHB7ZCZp6AJWOHQ5CDxVy3rPjghngr69obcqdplr8/edit?usp=sharing.
dc.relation.referencesen[11] Gotham Greens. (n.d.). Our farms. Retrieved from https://www.gothamgreens.com/our-farms/.
dc.relation.referencesen[12] Herrmann, M.M. (2015). The modern day "Victory Garden". Procedia Engineering, 118, 647-653. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.498.
dc.relation.referencesen[13] Hnes, I., & Ivanochko, U. (2019). Spatial and social aspects of creating the housing environment in big cities. Rocznik Lubuski, 45(2), 51-68. doi: 10.34768/rl.2019.v452.04.
dc.relation.referencesen[14] Kocsis, J.B., & Tomay, K. (2024). Suburban sustainability in Budapest agglomeration – the case of Törökbálint. Sustainability, 16(8), article number 3449. doi: 10.3390/su16083449.
dc.relation.referencesen[15] Komar, B. (2023). Aspern Seestadt in Vienna in the assessment of the urban audit. Housing Environment, 44(3) 25-34. doi: 10.4467/25438700sm.23.019.18480.
dc.relation.referencesen[16] Mensah, J.K. (2023). Stimulating and developing sustainable urban local economies: The role of urban agriculture. Development Southern Africa, 40(5), 1086-1099. doi: 10.1080/0376835x.2023.2177259.
dc.relation.referencesen[17] Miroshnyk, N. (2023). Green infrastructure, urbanization and ecosystem services – relationships in a megalopolis. Factors of Experimental Evolution of Organisms, 33, 135-140. doi: 10.7124/feeo.v33.1581.
dc.relation.referencesen[18] Mougeot, L.J.A. (2005). Agropolis: The social, political, and environmental dimensions of urban agriculture. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesen[19] Panțiru, I., Ronaldson, A., Sima, N., Dregan, A., & Sima, R. (2024). The impact of gardening on well-being, mental health, and quality of life: An umbrella review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 13, article number 45. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02457-9.
dc.relation.referencesen[20] Reed, P. (2021). Physical activity is good for the mind and the body. Retrieved from https://odphp.health.gov/news/202112/physical-activity-good-mind-and-body.
dc.relation.referencesen[21] Rosenfield, K. (2014). SPARK proposes vertical farming hybrid to house Singapore’s aging population. ArchDaily. Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/573783/spark-proposes-vertical-farming-hybrid-to-house-singapore-s-aging-population-2.
dc.relation.referencesen[22] Sarzynski, A., & Vicino, T.J. (2019). Shrinking suburbs: Analyzing the decline of American suburban spaces. Sustainability, 11(19), article number 5230. doi: 10.3390/su11195230.
dc.relation.referencesen[23] Scott, T.L., Masser, B.M., & Pachana, N.A. (2020). Positive aging benefits of home and community gardening activities: Older adults report enhanced self-esteem, productive endeavors, social engagement and exercise. SAGE Open Medicine, 8. doi: 10.1177/2050312120901732.
dc.relation.referencesen[24] SPARK – HOME FARM. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://sparkarchitects.com/work/home-farm.
dc.relation.referencesen[25] Srinivasan, K., & Yadav, V.K. (2024). Fresh bell peppers consumed in cities: Unveiling the environmental impact of urban and rural food supply systems. Science of the Total Environment, 927, article number 172359. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172359.
dc.relation.referencesen[26] Starr, D. (2021). The air investigator. Science, 373(6555), 612-615. doi: 10.1126/science.373.6555.612.
dc.relation.referencesen[27] Sun, C., Wang, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2023). Urbanization and residents’ health: From the perspective of environmental pollution. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 67820-67838. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26979-2.
dc.relation.referencesen[28] Tan, T.H., & Lee, W.C. (2023). Life satisfaction and perceived and objective neighborhood environments in a green-accredited township: Quantile regression approach. Cities, 134, article number 104196. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104196.
dc.relation.referencesen[29] Waldinger, R., & Schulz, M. (2023). The Good life: Lessons from the world’s longest scientific study of happiness. New York: Simon & Schuster.
dc.relation.referencesen[30] Wen, C.P., et al. (2011). Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: A prospective cohort study. Lancet, 378(9798), 1244-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60749-6.
dc.relation.referencesen[31] Whole Foods goes ultra-local with Gotham Greens greenhouse in Brooklyn. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.greenbiz.com/article/whole-foods-goes-ultra-local-gotham-greens-greenhouse-brooklyn.
dc.relation.referencesen[32] Wood Housing Seestadt Aspern, Querkraft + Berger+Parkkinen Architekten. (2020). ArchDaily. Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/950123/wood-housing-seestadt-aspern-berger-plus-parkkinen-architekten-plus-querkraft-architects?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab.
dc.relation.urihttps://www.archdaily.com
dc.relation.urihttps://zinco-greenroof.com/references/avling-kitchen-and-brewery-toronto
dc.relation.urihttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fgUHB7ZCZp6AJWOHQ5CDxVy3rPjghngr69obcqdplr8/edit?usp=sharing
dc.relation.urihttps://www.gothamgreens.com/our-farms/
dc.relation.urihttps://odphp.health.gov/news/202112/physical-activity-good-mind-and-body
dc.relation.urihttps://www.archdaily.com/573783/spark-proposes-vertical-farming-hybrid-to-house-singapore-s-aging-population-2
dc.relation.urihttps://sparkarchitects.com/work/home-farm
dc.relation.urihttps://www.greenbiz.com/article/whole-foods-goes-ultra-local-gotham-greens-greenhouse-brooklyn
dc.relation.urihttps://www.archdaily.com/950123/wood-housing-seestadt-aspern-berger-plus-parkkinen-architekten-plus-querkraft-architects?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет „Львівська політехніка“, 2025
dc.subjectжитло
dc.subjectквартира
dc.subjectпланування
dc.subjectозеленення
dc.subjectаграрне виробництво
dc.subjecthousing
dc.subjectapartment
dc.subjectplanning
dc.subjectlandscaping
dc.subjectagricultural production
dc.subject.udc721/728
dc.subject.udc2.05
dc.titleClassification of agricultural elements used in buildings
dc.title.alternativeКласифікація аграрного елемента в структурі будівлі
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2025v11n1_Rubai_R-Classification_of_agricultural_106-117.pdf
Size:
2.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.78 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: