The effective hydropower potential of the Mszanka River in South Poland – the course of estimation

dc.citation.epage202
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.spage193
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow
dc.contributor.authorOperacz, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.authorKotowski, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorBugajski, Piotr
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-25T09:02:44Z
dc.date.available2020-02-25T09:02:44Z
dc.date.created2018-10-26
dc.date.issued2018-10-26
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the paper was to calculate the actual (called “effective”) hydropower potential based on the identification of real possibilities of small hydro power plants realization. As an example river Mszanka in South Poland was chosen. The course of estimation was shown in Polish conditions of law, procedures and environmental barriers. The comparison of estimated values of effective potential was done with theoretical and technical potential.
dc.format.extent193-202
dc.format.pages10
dc.identifier.citationOperacz A. The effective hydropower potential of the Mszanka River in South Poland – the course of estimation / Agnieszka Operacz, Tomasz Kotowski, Piotr Bugajski // Environmental problems. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — Vol 3. — No 3. — P. 193–202.
dc.identifier.citationenOperacz A. The effective hydropower potential of the Mszanka River in South Poland – the course of estimation / Agnieszka Operacz, Tomasz Kotowski, Piotr Bugajski // Environmental problems. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — Vol 3. — No 3. — P. 193–202.
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/45993
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental problems, 3 (3), 2018
dc.relation.references1. Allwood J. M., V. Bosetti, N. K. Dubash, L. GómezEcheverri, von Stechow C.: Glossary. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA 2014.
dc.relation.references2. Stangeland A., Grini G.: The potential and barriers for RE. Bellona Paper, Oslo, Norway, 2007.
dc.relation.references3. Hoogwijk M., Graus W.: Global potential of RES: a literature assessment. Background report prepared by order of REN21. Ecofys, PECSNL072975, 2008.
dc.relation.references4. Krewitt W., Simon S., Pregger T.: RE deployment potentials in large economies. DLR (German Aerospace Center), 2008.
dc.relation.references5. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer C., Toro F., Haas R., 2008. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.029
dc.relation.references6. Verbruggen A., Fischedick M., Moomaw W., Weir T., Nadai A., Nilsson L. J., Nyboer J., Sathaye J., Energy Policy, 2010, 38 (2), 850.
dc.relation.references7. Ataei, A., Biglari, M., Nedaei, M., Assareh, E., Choi, J.-K., Yoo, C. and Adaramola, M. S. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy 2015, 34, 1521. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12121
dc.relation.references8. Esen H., Mustafa I., Esen M. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(5), 1955. DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.007
dc.relation.references9. Izadyar N., Ong Ch. H., Chong W. T., Leong K. Y. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016, 62, 908. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.005
dc.relation.references10. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer Ch., Toro F., Haas R. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol. 2008.06.029
dc.relation.references11. Zimny J., Michalak P., Bielik S., Szczotka K. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21, 117. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.049
dc.relation.references12. Ferreira J. H. I., Camacho J. R. C., Malagoli J. A., Guimaraes JR. S. C. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56, 380. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.035
dc.relation.references13. Farooq M. K., Kumar S. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 2013, 20, 240. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.042
dc.relation.references14. Painuly J. P. Renew Energy, 2001, 24 (1), 73. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00186-5
dc.relation.references15. Sample J. E., Duncan N., Ferguson M., Cooksley S. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 52, 111. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.071
dc.relation.references16. Morales S., Alvares C., Acevedo C., Diaz C., Rodriguez M., Pacheco L. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50, 1650. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.026
dc.relation.references17. Operacz, A. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 75 (9), 1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.141
dc.relation.references18. Resolution no 4/2014 of the RZGW Director in Krakow [in Polish] https://bip.malopolska.pl/rzgwkrakow/Article/get/id,848610.html
dc.relation.references19. IMGW 1980: Przepływy charakterystyczne rzek Polski w latach 1951–1970. WKiŁ., Warszawa [in Polish].
dc.relation.references20. Grela J., Stochliński T. 2005: O metodach wyznaczenia wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego. “Aura” no. 6. [in Polish]
dc.relation.references21. Operacz A., Wałęga A., Cupak A., Tomaszewska B. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 193, 575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098
dc.relation.references22. Operacz A. Economics and Environment, 2015, 1(52), 100. [in Polish] http://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/uploads/ekonomiaisrodowisko52/06_operacz.pdf
dc.relation.references23. Kostrzewa H. 2005: Weryfikacja kryteriów i wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego dla rzek Polski. Materiały Badawcze, Seria Gospodarka Wodna i Ochrona Wód., Warszawa. [in Polish]
dc.relation.references24. Wałęga A., Młyński D., Kokoszka R., Miernik W. 2014. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24 (6), 2663–2676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/59294
dc.relation.references25. Restor-Hydro map, http://www.restor-hydro.eu/en/tools/mills-map/
dc.relation.references26. Kaczor G., Bergel T., Bugajski P., Pijanowski J. 2015. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Hard Olsztyn. Vol. 24, No. 1, 107–114. [DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/28355]
dc.relation.referencesen1. Allwood J. M., V. Bosetti, N. K. Dubash, L. GómezEcheverri, von Stechow C., Glossary. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA 2014.
dc.relation.referencesen2. Stangeland A., Grini G., The potential and barriers for RE. Bellona Paper, Oslo, Norway, 2007.
dc.relation.referencesen3. Hoogwijk M., Graus W., Global potential of RES: a literature assessment. Background report prepared by order of REN21. Ecofys, PECSNL072975, 2008.
dc.relation.referencesen4. Krewitt W., Simon S., Pregger T., RE deployment potentials in large economies. DLR (German Aerospace Center), 2008.
dc.relation.referencesen5. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer C., Toro F., Haas R., 2008. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.029
dc.relation.referencesen6. Verbruggen A., Fischedick M., Moomaw W., Weir T., Nadai A., Nilsson L. J., Nyboer J., Sathaye J., Energy Policy, 2010, 38 (2), 850.
dc.relation.referencesen7. Ataei, A., Biglari, M., Nedaei, M., Assareh, E., Choi, J.-K., Yoo, C. and Adaramola, M. S. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy 2015, 34, 1521. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12121
dc.relation.referencesen8. Esen H., Mustafa I., Esen M. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(5), 1955. DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.007
dc.relation.referencesen9. Izadyar N., Ong Ch. H., Chong W. T., Leong K. Y. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016, 62, 908. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.005
dc.relation.referencesen10. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer Ch., Toro F., Haas R. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol. 2008.06.029
dc.relation.referencesen11. Zimny J., Michalak P., Bielik S., Szczotka K. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21, 117. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.049
dc.relation.referencesen12. Ferreira J. H. I., Camacho J. R. C., Malagoli J. A., Guimaraes JR. S. C. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56, 380. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.035
dc.relation.referencesen13. Farooq M. K., Kumar S. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 2013, 20, 240. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.042
dc.relation.referencesen14. Painuly J. P. Renew Energy, 2001, 24 (1), 73. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00186-5
dc.relation.referencesen15. Sample J. E., Duncan N., Ferguson M., Cooksley S. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 52, 111. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.071
dc.relation.referencesen16. Morales S., Alvares C., Acevedo C., Diaz C., Rodriguez M., Pacheco L. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50, 1650. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.026
dc.relation.referencesen17. Operacz, A. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 75 (9), 1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.141
dc.relation.referencesen18. Resolution no 4/2014 of the RZGW Director in Krakow [in Polish] https://bip.malopolska.pl/rzgwkrakow/Article/get/id,848610.html
dc.relation.referencesen19. IMGW 1980: Przepływy charakterystyczne rzek Polski w latach 1951–1970. WKiŁ., Warszawa [in Polish].
dc.relation.referencesen20. Grela J., Stochliński T. 2005: O metodach wyznaczenia wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego. "Aura" no. 6. [in Polish]
dc.relation.referencesen21. Operacz A., Wałęga A., Cupak A., Tomaszewska B. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 193, 575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098
dc.relation.referencesen22. Operacz A. Economics and Environment, 2015, 1(52), 100. [in Polish] http://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/uploads/ekonomiaisrodowisko52/06_operacz.pdf
dc.relation.referencesen23. Kostrzewa H. 2005: Weryfikacja kryteriów i wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego dla rzek Polski. Materiały Badawcze, Seria Gospodarka Wodna i Ochrona Wód., Warszawa. [in Polish]
dc.relation.referencesen24. Wałęga A., Młyński D., Kokoszka R., Miernik W. 2014. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24 (6), 2663–2676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/59294
dc.relation.referencesen25. Restor-Hydro map, http://www.restor-hydro.eu/en/tools/mills-map/
dc.relation.referencesen26. Kaczor G., Bergel T., Bugajski P., Pijanowski J. 2015. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Hard Olsztyn. Vol. 24, No. 1, 107–114. [DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/28355]
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12121
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.141
dc.relation.urihttps://bip.malopolska.pl/rzgwkrakow/Article/get/id,848610.html
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098
dc.relation.urihttp://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/uploads/ekonomiaisrodowisko52/06_operacz.pdf
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/59294
dc.relation.urihttp://www.restor-hydro.eu/en/tools/mills-map/
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2018
dc.rights.holder© Operacz A., Kotowski T., Bugajski P., 2018
dc.subjecthydropower potential
dc.subjectRES
dc.subjectsustainable management
dc.subjectsmall HPP
dc.titleThe effective hydropower potential of the Mszanka River in South Poland – the course of estimation
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2018v3n3_Operacz_A-The_effective_hydropower_193-202.pdf
Size:
511.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2018v3n3_Operacz_A-The_effective_hydropower_193-202__COVER.png
Size:
434.48 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.97 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: