Модель специфічних факторів виробництво: загальна концепція і часткові наслідки

dc.citation.epage178
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.journalTitleМенеджмент та підприємництво в Україні: етапи становлення і проблеми розвитку
dc.citation.spage164
dc.citation.volume6
dc.contributor.affiliationНаціональний університет “Львівська політехніка”
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.authorБосак, А. О.
dc.contributor.authorBosak, A. O.
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-27T13:17:08Z
dc.date.created2024-06-22
dc.date.issued2024-06-22
dc.description.abstractДосліджено структуру експортних галузей України у довоєнний період та сформо- вано критерії оцінювання їх експортного потенціалу. Формалізовано класичну модель специфічних факторів виробництва з урахуванням особливостей міжнародної торгівлі України. Систематизовано часткові наслідки моделі специфічних факторів вироб- ництва в частині їх впливу на реальну заробітну плату та відсоткову ставку. Узагаль- нено наслідки перерозподілу факторів виробництва між галузями у післявоєнний пе- ріод. Сформовано інструменти застосування моделі специфічних факторів виробництва для розвитку міжнародної економічної діяльності України.
dc.description.abstractThe specific factor model is interesting for its partial consequences in crisis economies. The distribution of factors according to the levels of inter-branch and international mobility allows us to assess the extent to which the movement of homogeneous factors can replace the lack of specific ones in a separate field. Modeling the distribution of specific and homogeneous factors will allow to optimize the structure of export industries and to determine how the change in the global situation will affect the level of real wages in the industries and the cost of their capital. This will improve the planning of budgets at different levels and the deployment of productive forces. The purpose of the article is to study the possibility of applying the specific factor model to optimize Ukraine’s international trade and develop its export potential. The main research methods were theoretical generalization, economic-statistical analysis, graphic-analytical method. The information base of the research was Heckscher-Ohlin theory, factor price equalization theorem, the theory of specific factor, Jones magnification effect and a wide statistical database of Ukraine’s exports. To achieve the set goal, the following tasks were completed: an analysis of the structure of Ukraine’s export industries and individual products was carried out; the most appropriate pair of industries (goods) for modeling the distribution of specific factors was identified; formalized the basic concept of the classical specific factor model, taking into account the export structure of Ukraine; the partial effects of the distribution of specific factors between export industries and/or individual groups of goods are described; tools for the application of the specific factor model and its partial consequences in the process of post-war economic recovery of Ukraine were formed. The structure of Ukraine’s exports changed greatly in 2000–2021. Until 2012, the main export income was provided by metallurgy (31,15 % on average), and by 2021 its share fell to 18,31 %. Instead, the share of agricultural exports increased from 12,2 % to 36,35 %. The share of exports of the chemical industry decreased from 9,53 % to 4,5 %, exports of mechanical engineering and electronics almost completely disappeared. There were also significant changes in the structure of export of services: the IT sector took first place (14,19 %), the export of transport services decreased from 15,41 % to 5,38 %, and the tourism industry, after the peak of development in 2004–2013 (6,02 % of exports an average), was practically destroyed by the war and the epidemic of COVID-19 (0,53 % of exports in 2020). The use of the specific factor model in the conditions of the post-war development of Ukraine will allow to optimize the distribution of scarce resources between industries. At the same time, the criteria of export potential should be taken into account: 1) statistically significant indicators of the growth of physical and monetary volumes of exports; 2) the existence of a correlation between price indicators of the domestic and world markets and changes in demand indicators; 3) the possibility of quick involvement of additional factors in the event of increase in demand on the world market; 4) the existence of a relationship between the prices of export goods and the cost of factors; 5) comparison of growth rates of real wages and interest rates in export industries with average growth rates of commodity prices; 6) relatively low elasticity of demand in foreign markets compared to domestic. It is quite possible that we will have to temporarily abandon the export development of certain industries. In the future, it will be necessary to develop specific tools for the application of this model in practice, namely: 1) to carry out an audit of existing production factors; identify those of them that can be transformed from specific to universal by liquidating individual capital assets and retraining engineering and technical personnel; 2) identify the most promising industries and groups of goods within them, where it will be appropriate to direct scarce resources; 3) to build correlation dependences of changes in price levels and production volumes of selected industries and changes in real factor prices; 4) calculate changes in macroeconomic indicators that will occur as a result of using the tools of the specific factor model.
dc.format.extent164-178
dc.format.pages15
dc.identifier.citationБосак А. О. Модель специфічних факторів виробництво: загальна концепція і часткові наслідки / А. О. Босак // Менеджмент та підприємництво в Україні: етапи становлення і проблеми розвитку. — Львів : Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2024. — Том 6. — № 1. — С. 164–178.
dc.identifier.citation2015Босак А. О. Модель специфічних факторів виробництво: загальна концепція і часткові наслідки // Менеджмент та підприємництво в Україні: етапи становлення і проблеми розвитку, Львів. 2024. Том 6. № 1. С. 164–178.
dc.identifier.citationenAPABosak, A. O. (2024). Model spetsyfichnykh faktoriv vyrobnytstvo: zahalna kontseptsiia i chastkovi naslidky [Pecific factor model: general concept and partial consequences]. Management and Entrepreneurship in Ukraine: the Stages of Formation and Problems of Development, 6(1), 164-178. Lviv Politechnic Publishing House. [in Ukrainian].
dc.identifier.citationenCHICAGOBosak A. O. (2024) Model spetsyfichnykh faktoriv vyrobnytstvo: zahalna kontseptsiia i chastkovi naslidky [Pecific factor model: general concept and partial consequences]. Management and Entrepreneurship in Ukraine: the Stages of Formation and Problems of Development (Lviv), vol. 6, no 1, pp. 164-178 [in Ukrainian].
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.23939/smeu2024.01.164
dc.identifier.issn2707-5710
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/122358
dc.language.isouk
dc.publisherВидавництво Львівської політехніки
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofМенеджмент та підприємництво в Україні: етапи становлення і проблеми розвитку, 1 (6), 2024
dc.relation.ispartofManagement and Entrepreneurship in Ukraine: the Stages of Formation and Problems of Development, 1 (6), 2024
dc.relation.references1. Heckscher Eli. (1919). The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift,497–512. Reprinted as Chapter 13 in A.E.A. (1949). Readings in the Theory of International Trade, 272–300 (Philadelphia: Blakiston) with a Translation in H. Flam and M. J. Flanders (Eds.). 1991. Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory, 43–69. Cambridge: MIT Press.
dc.relation.references2. Ohlin Bertil. (1933). Interregional and International Trade. Harvard Economic Studies. Vol. XXXIX. Harvard University Press; London: Humphrey Milford. 1933. 8vo. Pp. xvii + 617. The Economic Journal, Volume44, Issue 173, 1 March 1934, Pp. 95–102.
dc.relation.references3. Samuelson Paul. (1948). International trade and the equalization of factor prices. Economic Journal, Vol.58, No. 230 (June, 1948), pp. 163–184. Published By: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.references4. Vanek Jaroslav. (1968). The Factor Proportions Theory: The N-Factor Case. Kyklos, October 1968, 21,749–755.
dc.relation.references5. Jones R. W. (1965). The Structure of Simple General Equilibrium Models. Journal of Political Economy,73(6), 557–572. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1829883 (дата звернення:28.03.2024).
dc.relation.references6. Jones R. W. (1971). Distortions in Factor Markets and the General Equilibrium Model of Production. Journal of Political Economy, 79(3), 437–459. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1830766 (дата звернення: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.references7. Jones R. W. (1971). A Three-Factor Model in Theory, Trade and History. Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth, ed. J. N. Bhagwati, R. W. Jones, R. A. Mundell, and J. Vanek. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
dc.relation.references8. Viner Jacob. (1955). Studies in the theory of international trade. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
dc.relation.references9. Leamer Edward E. & Levinsohn James (1994). International trade theory: the evidence. National bureau of economic research. Working paper #1940.
dc.relation.references10. Mussa Michael. (1974). Tariffs and the distribution of income: The importance of factor specificity, substitutability and intensity in the short and long-run. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1191–1204.
dc.relation.references11. Neary J. P. (1978). Short-run capital specificity and the pure theory of international trade. Economic Journal, 88, 488–510.
dc.relation.references12. Bajona C. (2004). Specific Factors, Learning, and the Dynamics of Trade. International Economic Review, 45(2), 499–521. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663529 (дата звернення: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.references13. Yenokyan K., Seater J. J., & Arabshahi M. (2014). Economic growth with trade in factors of production. International Economic Review, 55(1), 223–254. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/24517168 (дата звернення: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.references14. Hiscox M. J. (2001). Class versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-Industry Factor Mobility and the Politics of Trade. International Organization, 55(1), 1–46. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3078596 (дата звернення: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.references15. Luttmer Erzo G. J., & Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Research Department. (2013). The Stolper- Samuelson Effects of a Decline in Aggregate Consumption (Issue 703) [Reports]. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://jstor.org/stable/community.28111549 (дата звернення: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.references16. Panagariya A. (1986). Increasing Returns and the Specific Factors Model. Southern Economic Journal,53(1), 1–17. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://doi.org/10.2307/1058950 (дата звернення:28.03.2024).
dc.relation.references17. Атлас економічної складності. Гарвардська школа уряду імені Кеннеді [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/countries/228/summary (дата звернення: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.references18. International Trade: Theory and Policy (2012). Chapter 5: The Heckscher-Ohlin (Factor Proportions) Model. Published by Saylor Academy (HTML version by Andy Schmitz) [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_international-trade-theory-and-policy/s08-the-heckscher-ohlin-factor-pro.html (дата звернення: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.referencesen1. Heckscher, Eli (1919). The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift,497–512. Reprinted as Chapter 13 in A.E.A. (1949). Readings in the Theory of International Trade, 272–300 (Philadelphia: Blakiston) with a Translation in H. Flam and M. J. Flanders (Eds.). 1991. Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory, 43–69. Cambridge: MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesen2. Ohlin, Bertil (1933). Interregional and International Trade. Harvard Economic Studies. Vol. XXXIX. Harvard University Press; London: Humphrey Milford. 1933. 8vo. Pp. xvii + 617. The Economic Journal, Volume 44, Issue 173, 1 March 1934, Pp. 95–102.
dc.relation.referencesen3. Samuelson, Paul. (1948). International trade and the equalization of factor prices. Economic Journal, Vol.58, No. 230 (June, 1948), pp. 163–184. Published By: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesen4. Vanek, Jaroslav (1968). The Factor Proportions Theory: The N-Factor Case. Kyklos, October, pp. 749–755.
dc.relation.referencesen5. Jones, R. W. (1965). The Structure of Simple General Equilibrium Models. Journal of Political Economy,73(6), 557–572. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1829883 (accessed: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.referencesen6. Jones, R. W. (1971). Distortions in Factor Markets and the General Equilibrium Model of Production. Journal of Political Economy, 79(3), 437–459. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1830766 (accessed:28.03.2024).
dc.relation.referencesen7. Jones, R. W. (1971). A Three-Factor Model in Theory, Trade and History. Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth, ed. J. N. Bhagwati, R. W. Jones, R. A. Mundell, and J. Vanek. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
dc.relation.referencesen8. Viner, Jacob (1955). Studies in the theory of international trade. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
dc.relation.referencesen9. Leamer, Edward E. & Levinsohn, James. (1994). International trade theory: the evidence. National bureau of economic research. Working paper #1940.
dc.relation.referencesen10. Mussa, Michael (1974). Tariffs and the distribution of income: The importance of factor specificity, substitutability and intensity in the short and long-run. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1191–1204.
dc.relation.referencesen11. Neary, J. P. (1978). Short-run capital specificity and the pure theory of international trade. Economic Journal, 88, 488–510.
dc.relation.referencesen12. Bajona, C. (2004). Specific Factors, Learning, and the Dynamics of Trade. International Economic Review, 45(2), 499–521. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663529 (accessed: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.referencesen13. Yenokyan, K., Seater, J. J., & Arabshahi, M. (2014). Economic growth with trade in factors of production. International Economic Review, 55(1), 223–254. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24517168 (accessed:28.03.2024).
dc.relation.referencesen14. Hiscox, M. J. (2001). Class versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-Industry Factor Mobility and the Politics of Trade. International Organization, 55(1), 1–46. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3078596 (accessed:28.03.2024).
dc.relation.referencesen15. Luttmer, Erzo G. J., & Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Research Department. (2013). The Stolper- Samuelson Effects of a Decline in Aggregate Consumption (Issue 703) [Reports]. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Retrieved from: https://jstor.org/stable/community.28111549 (accessed: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.referencesen16. Panagariya, A. (1986). Increasing Returns and the Specific Factors Model. Southern Economic Journal,53(1), 1–17. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2307/1058950 (accessed: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.referencesen17. The Atlas of Economic Complexity. Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Retrieved from: https://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/countries/228/summary (accessed: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.referencesen18. International Trade: Theory and Policy (2012). Chapter 5: The Heckscher-Ohlin (Factor Proportions) Model. Published by Saylor Academy (HTML version by Andy Schmitz). Retrieved from: https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_international-trade-theory-and-policy/s08-the-heckscher-ohlin-factor-pro.html(accessed: 28.03.2024).
dc.relation.urihttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1829883
dc.relation.urihttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1830766
dc.relation.urihttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3663529
dc.relation.urihttp://www.jstor.org/
dc.relation.urihttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3078596
dc.relation.urihttps://jstor.org/stable/community.28111549
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.2307/1058950
dc.relation.urihttps://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/countries/228/summary
dc.relation.urihttps://saylordotorg.github.io/text_international-trade-theory-and-policy/s08-the-heckscher-ohlin-factor-pro.html
dc.relation.urihttp://www.jstor.org/stable/24517168
dc.relation.urihttps://saylordotorg.github.io/text_international-trade-theory-and-policy/s08-the-heckscher-ohlin-factor-pro.html(accessed:
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет „Львівська політехніка“, 2024
dc.rights.holder© Босак А. О., 2024
dc.subjectспецифічний фактор виробництва
dc.subjectмодель специфічних факторів виробництва
dc.subjectтеорія Хекшера-Оліна
dc.subjectвідносні ціни факторів виробництва
dc.subjectтеорема ви- рівнювання цін на фактори виробництва
dc.subjectреальна заробітна плата
dc.subjectреальна ставка відсотка
dc.subjectекспортний потенціал
dc.subjectspecific factor
dc.subjectspecific factors model (SM model)
dc.subjectHeckscher-Ohlin theory (H-O model)
dc.subjectrelative factors prices
dc.subjectfactor price equalization theorem (FPET)
dc.subjectreal wages
dc.subjectreal interest rate
dc.subjectexport potential
dc.subject.udc339.5.01
dc.subject.udc330.111.4
dc.titleМодель специфічних факторів виробництво: загальна концепція і часткові наслідки
dc.title.alternativePecific factor model: general concept and partial consequences
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2024v6n1_Bosak_A_O-Pecific_factor_model_general_164-178.pdf
Size:
1.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.74 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: