Трансформація уявлень про поняття «Спадщини» у модерному та постмодерному дискурс

dc.citation.epage31
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.journalTitleВісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Архітектура
dc.citation.spage23
dc.citation.volume2
dc.contributor.affiliationНаціональний університет “Львівська політехніка”
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.authorЛясковський, Олег
dc.contributor.authorLiaskovsky, Oleh
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-20T09:22:55Z
dc.date.available2023-09-20T09:22:55Z
dc.date.created2020-03-01
dc.date.issued2020-03-01
dc.description.abstractНа основі порівняльного аналізу простежено трансформацію поняття спадщини у модерному та постмодерному дискурсі. Виявлено зв’язок між ексклюзивною та інклюзивною моделями розуміння історичної вартості архітектурного об’єкта в контексті розуміння естетики містобудівного середовища.
dc.description.abstractConsideration of contemporary urban environment aesthetics is also closely linked to the category of heritage, which is growing in importance and is expanding. The concept of heritage itself is, in turn, a modern phenomenon that emerged only in the nineteenth century and is largely linked to the formation of political nations. Based on comparative analysis, has been traced the transformation of the concept of heritage in modern and postmodern discourse. Also, has been identified the relationship between exclusive and inclusive models of understanding the historical value of an architectural object in the context of understanding the aesthetics of the urban environment. It is determined that due to the significant extension of the typology and the number of heritage objects, the concept of urban aesthetics, in addition to the traditional parameters, receives a new resource for its understanding. Potential increase of heritage sites number, leads to improvement in the subjective perception of living space. At the same time, the value valorization of modern urban formations requires a change in the basic attitudes in mass culture, that have existed in it since the postmodern times. The strategy of facilitating this process is an important task of future theoretical research as in architectural (city planning), as in cultural, social, media etc. It had been analyzed a process of reducing the chronological distance between the appearance of a building and its listing as the heritage; the gradual acceptance as a heritage of objects of modernist architecture. Also it had been identified the phenomenon of juxtaposition of "historical" and "modern" types of project outlook in mass culture, which often becomes confrontational, in which modern architecture acted as a kind of negative antithesis to the positive hierotopy of the past. The problem of the absence in the national theory of architecture, the strategy of positive conceptualization of modernist heritage at the level of mass culture is outlined.
dc.format.extent23-31
dc.format.pages9
dc.identifier.citationЛясковський О. Трансформація уявлень про поняття «Спадщини» у модерному та постмодерному дискурс / Олег Лясковський // Вісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Архітектура. — Львів : Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2020. — Том 2. — № 1. — С. 23–31.
dc.identifier.citationenLiaskovsky O. Transformation of perceptions of the concept of “Heritage” in modern and postmodern discourse / Oleh Liaskovsky // Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Serie: Arkhitektura. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2020. — Vol 2. — No 1. — P. 23–31.
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/ 10.23939/sa2020.01.023
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/60170
dc.language.isouk
dc.publisherВидавництво Львівської політехніки
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofВісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Архітектура, 1 (2), 2020
dc.relation.referencesBoito, C.; Birignani, C. 2009, Restoration in architecture: First dialogue. Future Anterior, 6, p. 22.
dc.relation.referencesFrank G. 1993, The Conservation of Immovable Cultural Property: Ethical and Practical Dilemmas, Journal
dc.relation.referencesof the American Institute for Conservation, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 15–21.
dc.relation.referencesGlendinning M. 2013, The Conservation Movement: A History of Architectural Preservation, London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesJokilehto, J. 1986. A History of Architectural Conservation: The Contribution Of English, French, German
dc.relation.referencesAnd Italian Thought Towards An International Approach To The Conservation Of Cultural Property D.Phil. Thesis,
dc.relation.referencesThe University Of York, Institute of advanced Architectural Studies, England.
dc.relation.referencesJokilehto, J. 2008, The idea of conservation: An overview. In Conservation and Preservation: Interactions
dc.relation.referencesbetween Theory and Practice: In Memoriam Alois Riegl (1858–1905): Proceedings of the International Conference
dc.relation.referencesof the ICOMOS International Scientific Committee for the Theory and the Philosophy of Conservation; Polistampa: Vienna, Austria, p. 1000–1015.
dc.relation.referencesKuprianowicz G. 2008, Akcja burzenia cerkwi prawosławnych na Chełmszczyźnie i południowym Podlasiu,
dc.relation.referencesPrawosławna Diecezja Lubelsko-Chełmska, Chełm.
dc.relation.referencesLamprakos. M. 2014, Riegl’s “modern cult of monuments” and the problem of value. Chang. Time, р. 418–435.
dc.relation.referencesMachado, R. 1976, Old Buildings as palimpsest. Towards a theory of remodelling, Progressive Architecture, 1976/11: p. 46–49.
dc.relation.referencesMacDonald S. 2013. Modern Matters Breaking the Barriers to Conserving Modern Heritage, available at:
dc.relation.referenceshttps://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/newsletters/28_1/modern_matters.html [Accessed: 6.03.2020]
dc.relation.referencesPowell, K. 1999, Architecture reborn. Converting old buildings for new uses, New York: Rizzoliinternational publications, inc.
dc.relation.referencesRomanides J. S. 1981, Franks, Romans, Feudalism and Doctrine, Patriarch Athenagoras Memorial Lectures Holy Cross Orthodox Press
dc.relation.referencesScott. F.2007, On Altering Architecture; Routledge: London, UK
dc.relation.referencesStubbs J. H. 2011, Time Honored: A Global View of Architectural Conservation, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.referencesTheodore H. M. 2008, Preservation of Modern Architecture, Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley and Sons
dc.relation.referencesTunbridge, J. 1984, Whose heritage to conserve? Cross-cultural reflections on political dominance and
dc.relation.referencesurban heritage conservation, Canadian Geographer 1984 Vol.28 No.2, - pp.170-180 ref.34
dc.relation.referencesPrudon T. 2017, Preservation, design and modern architecture: the challenges ahead, Journal of Architectural Conservation 23(1–2):1–9 · June 2017
dc.relation.referencesVaccaro. A.1996, Restoration and anti-restoration. In Historical and Philisophical Issues in the
dc.relation.referencesConservation of Cultural Heritage. The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, pp. 308–313.
dc.relation.referencesWong, L. 2016, Adaptive Reuse: Extending the Lives of Buildings; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland.
dc.relation.referencesenBoito, C.; Birignani, C. 2009, Restoration in architecture: First dialogue. Future Anterior, 6, p. 22.
dc.relation.referencesenFrank G. 1993, The Conservation of Immovable Cultural Property: Ethical and Practical Dilemmas, Journal
dc.relation.referencesenof the American Institute for Conservation, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 15–21.
dc.relation.referencesenGlendinning M. 2013, The Conservation Movement: A History of Architectural Preservation, London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesenJokilehto, J. 1986. A History of Architectural Conservation: The Contribution Of English, French, German
dc.relation.referencesenAnd Italian Thought Towards An International Approach To The Conservation Of Cultural Property D.Phil. Thesis,
dc.relation.referencesenThe University Of York, Institute of advanced Architectural Studies, England.
dc.relation.referencesenJokilehto, J. 2008, The idea of conservation: An overview. In Conservation and Preservation: Interactions
dc.relation.referencesenbetween Theory and Practice: In Memoriam Alois Riegl (1858–1905): Proceedings of the International Conference
dc.relation.referencesenof the ICOMOS International Scientific Committee for the Theory and the Philosophy of Conservation; Polistampa:
dc.relation.referencesenVienna, Austria. Р. 1000–1015.
dc.relation.referencesenKuprianowicz G. 2008, Akcja burzenia cerkwi prawosławnych na Chełmszczyźnie i południowym Podlasiu,
dc.relation.referencesenPrawosławna Diecezja Lubelsko-Chełmska, Chełm
dc.relation.referencesenLamprakos. M. 2014, Riegl’s “modern cult of monuments” and the problem of value. Chang. Time, -р. 418–435.
dc.relation.referencesenMachado, R. 1976, Old Buildings as palimpsest. Towards a theory of remodelling, Progressive Architecture, 1976/11: p. 46–49.
dc.relation.referencesenMacDonald S. 2013. Modern Matters Breaking the Barriers to Conserving Modern Heritage, available at:
dc.relation.referencesenhttps://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/newsletters/28_1/modern_matters.html [Accessed: 6.03.2020]
dc.relation.referencesenPowell, K. 1999, Architecture reborn. Converting old buildings for new uses, New York: Rizzoliinternational publications, inc.
dc.relation.referencesenRomanides J. S. 1981, Franks, Romans, Feudalism and Doctrine, Patriarch Athenagoras Memorial Lectures Holy Cross Orthodox Press
dc.relation.referencesenScott. F.2007, On Altering Architecture; Routledge: London, UK
dc.relation.referencesenStubbs J. H. 2011, Time Honored: A Global View of Architectural Conservation, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.referencesenTheodore H. M. 2008, Preservation of Modern Architecture, Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley and Sons
dc.relation.referencesenTunbridge, J. 1984, Whose heritage to conserve? Cross-cultural reflections on political dominance and
dc.relation.referencesenurban heritage conservation, Canadian Geographer 1984 Vol.28 No.2, pp.170–180 ref.34
dc.relation.referencesenPrudon T. 2017, Preservation, design and modern architecture: the challenges ahead, Journal of
dc.relation.referencesenArchitectural Conservation 23(1-2):1-9. June 2017
dc.relation.referencesenVaccaro. A.1996, Restoration and anti-restoration. In Historical and Philisophical Issues in the
dc.relation.referencesenConservation of Cultural Heritage. The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, pp. 308–313.
dc.relation.referencesenWong, L. 2016, Adaptive Reuse: Extending the Lives of Buildings; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland.
dc.relation.urihttps://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/newsletters/28_1/modern_matters.html
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2020
dc.rights.holder© Лясковський О., 2020
dc.subjectспадщина
dc.subjectмодерність
dc.subjectпостмодерн
dc.subjectуявлення
dc.subjectтрансформація
dc.subjectheritage
dc.subjectmodernity
dc.subjectpostmodernity
dc.subjectimagination
dc.subjecttransformation
dc.subject.udc726
dc.titleТрансформація уявлень про поняття «Спадщини» у модерному та постмодерному дискурс
dc.title.alternativeTransformation of perceptions of the concept of “Heritage” in modern and postmodern discourse
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020v2n1_Liaskovsky_O-Transformation_of_perceptions_23-31.pdf
Size:
1.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020v2n1_Liaskovsky_O-Transformation_of_perceptions_23-31__COVER.png
Size:
406.38 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.78 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: