The significance of institution in business model reconstruction – two approaches
| dc.citation.conference | Litteris et Artibus | |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Economics in Katowice | uk_UA |
| dc.contributor.author | Dziubińska, Agnieszka | |
| dc.coverage.country | UA | uk_UA |
| dc.coverage.placename | Lviv | uk_UA |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-25T07:46:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-04-25T07:46:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The article presents two approaches of enterprises in the development of strategic actions in conditions of the so called institutional voids. According to type 1, which is typical for traditional enterprises, a change is regarded as a necessary compromise which is a threat to efficiency. When it comes to type 2, institutional voids are perceived as indicators for further development. Creative approach towards structural constraints of the setting translates into institutional innovation which may be the basis for strategic efficiency of enterprises which lack traditional sources of competitive advantage. | uk_UA |
| dc.format.pages | 253-258 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Dziubińska A. The significance of institution in business model reconstruction – two approaches / Agnieszka Dziubińska // Litteris et Artibus : proceedings of the 6th International youth science forum, November 24–26, 2016, Lviv, Ukraine / Lviv Polytechnic National University. – Lviv : Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House, 2016. – P. 253–258. – Bibliography: 19 titles. | uk_UA |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/40797 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | uk_UA |
| dc.publisher | Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House | uk_UA |
| dc.relation.referencesen | [1] Berger P., Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge, London: Allen Lane, 1976. [2] DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collec- tive Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, 1983, Vol. 48(2), pp. 147–160. [3] Hymer S. The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1976 [4] Khanna T., Palepu K. G. Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets? Harvard Business Review, Jul/Aug, 1997, pp. 41–51. [5] Khanna T., Palepu K. G. Emerging Gigants. Building World-Class Companies in Developing Countries, Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84(10), pp. 60–70. [6] Khanna T., Palepu K. G. Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press, 2010. [7] Khanna T., Palepu K. G., Sinha J. Strategies That Fit Emerging Markets, Harvard Business Review, 2005, Vol. 83, pp. 63–76. [8] Kostova T., Zaheer S. Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: the Case of the Multinational Enterprise, Academy of Management Review, 1999, Vol. 24(1), pp. 64–81. [9] Meyer J. W., Scott W. R. (1983), “Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality”, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1983. [10]Meyer K. Perspecitves on Multinational Enterprises in Emerging Economies, Journal of International Business Studies, 2004, Vol. 35(4), pp. 259–276. [11]North D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, MA, 1990. [12] Oliver C. Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes, Academy of Management Review, 1991, Vol. 16 (1), pp. 145–179. [13] Scott W. R. Institutions and Organizations, Thousands Oak, California: Sage, 2001.[14]Williamson O. E. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press, 1975. [15]Williamson O. E. Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives, Admi-nistrative Science Quarterly, 1991, Vol. 36, pp. 269–296. [16] Yin R. K. The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, Vol. 26, pp. 58–65. [17] Yin R. K. Case Study Research. Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2009. [18]Zimmerman M., Zeitz G. Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy, Academy of Management Review, 2002, Vol. 27(3), pp. 414–431. [19] Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje, http:// www.sena.edu.co. | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | institutional voids | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | business model | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | innovation | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | replication | uk_UA |
| dc.title | The significance of institution in business model reconstruction – two approaches | uk_UA |
| dc.type | Conference Abstract | uk_UA |