Вісники та науково-технічні збірники, журнали
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/12
Browse
7 results
Search Results
Item Трамвайні зупинки – реконструкція і перебудова (на прикладі центральної частини Львова)(Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2020-03-01) Посацький, Богдан; Мазур, Тамара; Король, Євгеній; Posatskyi, Bohdan; Mazur, Tamara; Korol, Evgenia; Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”; Lviv Polytechnic National UniversityПроведено аналіз реконструкції і перебудови сформованих у другій половині ХХ ст. зупинок трамвая у Львові в контексті зміни планування між магістральних територій на прикладі центральної частини міста. Показані містобудівні підходи до реконструкції між магістральних територій та привокзальної площі перед головним залізничним вокзалом міста.Item Territorial distribution of compositional and stylistic types of houses of the railway stations of Halychyna and Bukovyna(Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018-05-02) Рочняк, Юрій; Rotchniak, Youri; Lviv Polytechnic National UniversityДосліджено будинки залізничних вокзалів у зовнішніх просторово-пластичних рисах і сформульовано їхні композиційно-стилістичні типи, а також виявлено способи їхнього розташування територією Галичини та Буковини в Україні. Звертається увага на важливість збереження цих вокзалів як вагомого спадку будівельної культури.Item Особливості архітектури залізничних вокзалів Закарпаття(Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House, 2016) Рочняк, Ю. А.; Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”Архітектурно-просторові та композиційно-стилістичні особливості формування залізничних вокзалів Закарпаття розглянуто на тлі історичних і територіальних передумов. Проводиться порівняння вокзалів та пасажирських будівель з іншою громадською та житловою забудовою. The clear majority of railway stations and passenger facilities of Transcarpathia are historical, reasonably provide the needs of transportation and reflect interaction between different geographic, technical, temporal, political, stylistic, and other factors of their formation. They represent an important part of the architectural heritage of the region and therefore require professional study, protection and adjust to the needs of the recent time. The architecture of the early period of railway station building links Transcarpathia of 1870th with royal and Hungarian influences at the time of the Habsburg monarchy; postwar architecture of the mid-twentieth century links with the totalitarian Soviet era and serial pavilion links it with passenger facilities of other parts of Ukraine. Compositional and stylistic types of buildings create colorful palette and the most significant are railway stations performed on typical projects for the Royal Hungarian railways and the postwar Soviet classical railways. Typical for Transcarpathia are small-sized asymmetrical station building with declivous roofs, and sometimes with canopies or arched galleries. It is likely that they imitated the building of passenger station Karpaty/Carpathians built by the architectural motives of nearby located palace of former Count Schönborn of the turn of the ХІХ–ХХ centuries near Svalyava (now the sanatorium Karpaty). Part of the railway station buildings are unique and combined with some typical groups (Karpaty, Rakhiv, Uzhgorod, Yasinya). Recent decades show fragmentarity of some passenger facilities and railway station buildings (Velykyi Bereznyj, Uzhgorod, Chop/Tchop), relatively good care of smaller and degradation of unharmed railway branches (Solotvyno – Velykyi Bychkiv, all the forest mountain narrow-gauge railways except part of Borzhava railway) and some passenger facilities (Dobrosillya). The selectivity in building and maintenance of the proper technical condition of railway stations and passenger facilities, providing service is biased – disrespect and indifference to the peripheral objects during costly characteristics of the ‘main’. The existing railway infrastructure including railway stations and passenger facilities is a good precondition for more active railway communication through Galicia with most of the Ukraine, and with Slovakia, Hungary and Romania. Investigated multinational empires of Transcarpathian railways should ensure both local and transit transportation and promote communication of people in the latest realities of Ukraine and rest of Europe. In this case, railway station buildings should keep the architectural identity of the region.Item Архетипи залізничних вокзалів(Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2017-03-28) Рочняк, Ю. А.; Rotchniak, Y.; Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”; Lviv Polytechnic National UniversityВокзали залізниць розглянуто як сформований тип будівлі, що утворює архетипи елементів та цілісної споруди. Цей образ будівлі є сталим і взаємодіє з іншими типами громадських будівель та житла.Item Періоди формування архітектури пасажирських споруд залізниць Закарпаття(Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2016) Рочняк, Ю. А.; Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”Досліджуються найхарактерніші архітектурно-пластичні ознаки пасажирських споруд залізниць Закарпаття за основними історичними періодами їхнього формування. The article is concentrated on the most characteristic and primarily exterior architectural and compositional features of station buildings and passenger buildings of Transcarpathian railways according to the main historical periods of their formation. 1. The main historical periods of formation of Transcarpathian passenger buildings architecture, which were reflected in their composition, are determined in this article. Mostly, the periods correspond to state and political formations within this territory: Initial (1872–1914), Interwar (1919/1920–1938), Postwar (1945–1970), New (1970–2000) and Contemporary (from 2000). Wars and changes in the political formations could not be regarded as the positive factor for construction of railway station buildings (1914–1920, 1938–1945, 1991). 2. It was determined that Initial and Post-war periods were characterized by symmetrical composition of the main building, the image of these building matches other civil buildings of that time, facade finish, as well as the whole composition and corresponds to examples of classical buildings. Generic character and unification are confirmed by repeatedness of the use of such architecture in other territories of countries, to which Transcarpathia belonged at that time. This reflects the contemporary views of monarchical Austro-Hungarian (station buildings Batiovo, Berehovo, Bilyn, Lazeshtchyna, Vynohradiv, Vovtchyj, Zan’ka) totalitarian Soviet (Chop, Korolevo, Kosyny, Mukatchevo, Peretchyn, Svalava, Volovets,) centralistic patterns of life and thought. 3. The Interwar Period, when Carpathian Ruthenia belonged to Czechoslovakia (Irshava, Khust), and New Period (Velykyi Bereznyi, new building in Chop) demonstrate some liberty in formation of railway station buildings – no strict symmetry of form, laconism, no or limited number of decorations bring them Lviv Polytechnic National University Institutional Repository http://ena.lp.edu.ua 60 closer to rationalistic architecture. This is more common for residential and utilitarian construction and helps to perceive openness for the user and corresponds to the ideas of democratic communities. 4. The Contemporary Period shows polarity of approaches to architecture of passenger buildings of railway: on the one hand, this is the active visualization of facades, use of decorations, design of interiors that is close to idea of affirmation and pomposity (Uzhhorod, partially Rakhiv), and on the other hand, creating unpretentious canopies over the benches on the platforms (passenger buildings Svydovets, Uzhok). They are implemented by simple technological means, sometimes not very professionally, but as intended for users from remote areas. 5. Transcarpathia is characteristic of small passenger buildings at train stops of asymmetrical composition; some contain distinct arch motifs accompanied with half-open spaces or galleries. They differ in approach: from one-style with a large architectural complex (a stop Karpaty near health resort, the former palace of duke Schönborn near Svalava) to those made due to the typical design and replicated. Those buildings were erected in different periods, apart from the last one (Dobrosilla (it was destroyed 2012), Nevytske, Sil, Tsehlivka, Vorotchevo etc.). 6. By taking to account that the condition of Transcarpathia railway station buildings is satisfactory, there is the lack of quality in nowadays railway platforms of this region — their length and height rarely correspond to the length and height of the wagons, they are often narrow, are not fenced, don’t have easy access to sidewalks, as well as the ramps for wheelchairs and bicycles; coating, marking and labeling do not meet modern understanding; technical condition is average. Railway platforms of Uzhhorod station building and partly the Chop railway building are equipped with underground access, canopies, visual information system and in such a way they are getting close to modern safety requirements and the needs for passengers. On the one hand the small historical passenger building Dobrosilla (Bene) was destroyed and at another hand the new magnificent station building in Uzhhorod was constructed. With the course of time, a series of Transcarpathian station buildings were supplemented with new additions and underwent reconstruction that makes their dating more complicated and requires further research. The study shows temporal, typological and compositional diversity of passenger stations of Transcarpathian railway. They accompany us in the present and represent important architectural and economic achievements. Most of them require preservation, research and modernization as monuments.Item Архітектурні типи вокзалів залізниці Перемишль – Сучава(Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2015) Рочняк, Ю. А.Виявлені розміщення, характерні риси та стилістично-композиційні властивості вокзалів уздовж залізниці Перемишль – Сучава, сформульовані їхні головні типи.Item Розвиток вокзального комплексу м. Львова від минулого до майбутнього(Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2010) Русанова, І. В.; Шульга, Г. М.Розглянуто особливості формування вокзального комплексу у Львові в історичній послідовності від часу його побудови у 1861 р. до сьогодні. We consider the peculiarities of the railway station in Lviv in sequence from the time of its construction in 1861 to the present.