Культурна пам’ять як чинник конструювання ідентичності в умовах трансформації українського суспільства

Simple item page
dc.citation.epage22
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage15
dc.contributor.affiliationНаціональний університет “Львівська політехніка”
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.authorВербицька, Поліна
dc.contributor.authorVerbytska, Polina
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-26T12:27:59Z
dc.date.available2020-02-26T12:27:59Z
dc.date.created2019-02-26
dc.date.issued2019-02-26
dc.description.abstractСтаттю присвячено проблемі актуалізації потенціалу культурної пам’яті як соціального інструменту в процесі конструювання ідентичності особистості. Виокремлено та узагальнено проблеми, які існують у сфері колективної, суспільної і культурної пам’яті. Розкрито феномен культурної пам’яті як рушія змін та його зв'язок із теорією прав людини як індикатора демократичних змін. З’ясовано потенціал дослідження ролі культурної пам’яті у період демократичної трансформації українського суспільства як посередника нового суспільного наративу минулого, що інтегрує різні перспективи.
dc.description.abstractThe article deals with the problem of actualization of the cultural memory potential as a social tool in the process of identity construction in the conditions of the Ukrainian society democratic transformation. The main thesis of the article is that the cultural memory has mighty resources in the conditions of a democratic and lawful state, securing forming, preserving, transferring and developing of cultural norms, values, knowledge and meanings, contributing to integration, social consolidation. The representation of the historical past and of historical events which are created and disseminated in society within the limits of specific cultural markers and political context was outlined. It was found out that social memory is produced by mediated ideas of the past which represent selective, simplified inclusion and exclusion of information. It has been underlined that memorizing and forgetting are selective processes. There has been analyzed the notion “complex of memory” (according to Sharon Macdonald), which includes the interaction of three important components – memory, heritage and identity. It has been stated that actualization of historical narrative in places of memory is aimed at forming a personality’s identity, feeling of belonging to a certain community and its historical past. There has been underlined the connection between historical consciousness and cultural memory in the process of formation of a personality’s identity. It has been identified that values are an important component in the structure of historical consciousness of a personality. There has been explained the phenomenon of cultural memory as a mover of changes and its connection with the human rights theory as a democratic changes indicator. The significance of the role of human rights in the conditions of modernization and transformation has been substantiated. The role of the human rights idea in the modern transformation of Ukrainian society has been characterized. It has been allocated and summarized that recognition of the priority of human rights, human dignity gives possibility to form value attitude of an individual to memory and recollections of various individuals and communities, the willingness to transmission of values and experience of the past to other members of society, to overcome possible negative consequences of social interaction.
dc.format.extent15-22
dc.format.pages8
dc.identifier.citationВербицька П. Культурна пам’ять як чинник конструювання ідентичності в умовах трансформації українського суспільства / Поліна Вербицька // Historical and Cultural Studies. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — Vol 5. — No 1. — P. 15–22.
dc.identifier.citationenVerbytska P. Cultural memory as a factor of identity construction in the conditions of Ukrainian society transformation / Polina Verbytska // Historical and Cultural Studies. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — Vol 5. — No 1. — P. 15–22.
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/46093
dc.language.isouk
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofHistorical and Cultural Studies, 1 (5), 2018
dc.relation.references1. Ассман А. Простори спогаду. Форми трансформації культурної пам'яті. – К., 2012. – 440 с.
dc.relation.references2. Ассман Ян. Культурная память: Письмо, память о прошлом и политическая идентичность в высоких культурах древности. – М., 2004. – 368 с.
dc.relation.references3. Гриценко О. Гриценко Олександр. Пам’ять місцевого виробництва. Трансформація символічного простору та історичної пам’яті в малих містах України. – К., 2014. – 352 с.
dc.relation.references4. Инглхарт Р., Вельцель К. Модернизация, культурные изменения и демократия: Последовательность человеческого развития. – М., 2011. – 464 с.
dc.relation.references5. Хальбвакс M. Социальные рамки памяти. – М., 2007. – 348 с.
dc.relation.references6. Чепайтене Р. Культурное наследие в глобальном мире: монография. – Вильнюс, 2010. – 296 с.
dc.relation.references7. Яковенко Н. Вступ до Історії. – К., 2007. – 368 с.
dc.relation.references8. Araújo A. L. Politics of Memory: Making Slavery Visible in the Public Space. – New York, 2012. – 296 p.
dc.relation.references9. Andersen T. S., Törnquist-Plewa B. Disputed memory : emotions and memory politics in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. – Berlin; Boston, 2016. – 383 p.
dc.relation.references10. Assmann A., Shortt L. Memory and Political Change. New York, 2012. 248 p.
dc.relation.references11. Gillis J. R. Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity. Princeton, 1994. – 290 p.
dc.relation.references12. Huyssen A. Present Pasts: Uban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. California, 2003. 177 p.
dc.relation.references13. Jay Winter, Foreword: Remembrance as a Human Right in Assmann, Shortt (eds.) Memory and Political Change. New York, 2012. p. 7–11.
dc.relation.references14. Macdonald S. Memorylands : heritage and identity in Europe today. – London, 2013. – 293 p.
dc.relation.references15. Nora. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire // Representations, 1989. – Vol. 26. – P. 7–25.
dc.relation.referencesen1. Assman, A. (2012). Prostory spohadu. Formy transformatsii kulturnoi pamiati. [Spaces of memory. Forms of transformation of cultural memory]. – Kyiv, pp. 340–357 (ukr).
dc.relation.referencesen2. Assman, Y. (2004), Kulturnaja pamjat: Pismo, pamjat o proshlom i politicheskaja identichnost v vysokih kulturah drevnosti. [Cultural memory: a letter, a memory of the past and political identity in the high cultures of antiquity]. – Moscow, 368 p. (rus).
dc.relation.referencesen3. Hrytsenko, O. (2014), Pamiat mistsevoho vyrobnytstva. Transformatsiia symvolichnoho prostoru ta istorychnoi pamiati v malykh mistakh Ukrainy. [Local production memory. Transformation of symbolic space and historical memory in small cities of Ukraine]. Kyiv, 352 p. (ukr).
dc.relation.referencesen4. Inglhart, R., Velcel, K. (2011), Modernizacija, kulturnye izmenenija i demokratija: Posledovatelnost chelovecheskogo razvitija. [Modernization, cultural change and democracy: the sequence of human development]. – Moscow, 464 p. (ukr).
dc.relation.referencesen5. Halbvaks, M. (2007), Socialnye ramki pamjati. [Social framework of memory]. – Moscow, 348 p. (ukr).
dc.relation.referencesen6. Chepajtene, R. (2010), Kulturnoe nasledie v globalnom mire: monografiya. [Cultural heritage in the global world]. Vilnius, 296 p. (ukr).
dc.relation.referencesen7. Yakovenko, N. (2007), Vstup do Istorii. [Introduction to the history]. – Kyiv, 368 p. (ukr).
dc.relation.referencesen8. Araújo, A.L. (2012), Politics of Memory: Making Slavery Visible in the Public Space. – New York, 296 p.
dc.relation.referencesen9. Andersen, T.S., (2016), Törnquist-Plewa B. Disputed memory: emotions and memory politics in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. – Berlin; Boston, 383 p.
dc.relation.referencesen10. Assmann, A., Shortt, L. (2012), Memory and Political Change. – New York, 248 p.
dc.relation.referencesen11. Gillis, J.R. (1994), Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity. – Princeton, 290 p.
dc.relation.referencesen12. Huyssen, A. (2003), Present pasts: urban palimpsests and the politics of memory. – California, 177 p.
dc.relation.referencesen13. Jay Winter, (2012), Foreword: Remembrance as a Human Right in Assmann, Shortt (eds.) Memory and Political Change. – New York, p. 7–11.
dc.relation.referencesen14. Macdonald, S. (2013), Memorylands : heritage and identity in Europe today. – London, 2013, 293 p.
dc.relation.referencesen15. Nora, (1989), Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire // Representations, Vol. 26, p. 7–25.
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2018
dc.rights.holder© Verbytska P., 2018
dc.subjectідентичність
dc.subjectтрансформація
dc.subjectкультурна пам'ять
dc.subjectправа людини
dc.subjectмісця пам'яті
dc.subjectidentity
dc.subjecttransformation
dc.subjectcultural memory
dc.subjecthuman rights
dc.subjectplaces of memory
dc.subject.udc008
dc.subject.udc930.85
dc.subject.udc316.42
dc.titleКультурна пам’ять як чинник конструювання ідентичності в умовах трансформації українського суспільства
dc.title.alternativeCultural memory as a factor of identity construction in the conditions of Ukrainian society transformation
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2018v5n1_Verbytska_P-Cultural_memory_as_a_factor_15-22.pdf
Size:
646.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2018v5n1_Verbytska_P-Cultural_memory_as_a_factor_15-22__COVER.png
Size:
348.6 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.97 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Historical And Cultural Studies. – 2018. – Vol. 5, No. 1