Актуальні аспекти сталого розвитку бізнесу за ESG стандартами в Україні

dc.citation.epage40
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.journalTitleВісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія “Проблеми економіки та управління”
dc.citation.spage32
dc.contributor.affiliationНаціональний університет “Львівська політехніка”
dc.contributor.affiliationЛьвівський державний університет внутрішніх справ
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv State University of Internal Affairs, Department of social discipline
dc.contributor.authorКіржецька, М. С.
dc.contributor.authorКіржецький, Ю. І.
dc.contributor.authorKirzhetska, M.
dc.contributor.authorKirzhetskyy, Yu.
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-02T08:47:08Z
dc.date.available2023-11-02T08:47:08Z
dc.date.created2022-03-01
dc.date.issued2022-03-01
dc.description.abstractМета дослідження – виявлення взаємозв’язку між інтегральним індексом ESG та фінансовими показниками підприємства. Методологічною основою роботи стало емпіричне дослідження вибірки відкритих даних 56 підприємств, які у 2020 р. здійснювали діяльність на території України. Джерело дослідження – звіти щодо рівня прозорості українських підприємств та показники їхньої діяльності, які є у вибірці (отримані з бази даних edata.gov.ua). На підставі панельних даних побудовано регресійну модель залежності між індексом ESG та показником рентабельності активів. У результаті дослідження зроблено висновок, що чим вище значення такого фінансового показника підприємства, як рентабельність активів, тим вищим є індекс ESG. Тобто чим вищою є рентабельність активів, тим активніше підприємства спрямовують інвестиції у розвиток ESG ініціативи. Отримані результати мають практичну спрямованість, їх можуть використовувати власники, топ-менеджери підприємств та інвестори для формування бізнес-стратегії та прийняття інвестиційних рішень.
dc.description.abstractPurpose. The study aims to determine the relationship between the integrated ESG index and the company‟s financial performance. Based on the set goal, our tasks were: the approbation of the toolkit to confirm the hypothesis regarding the presence of a positive relationship between the ESG index and the company‟s return on assets (ROA). Also, we seek to confirm or refute the hypothesis that companies with a higher return on assets more often implement initiatives based on ESG principles and are more socially responsible market participants than their competitors. Design/methodology/approach. The methodological basis of the work was an empirical study of a sample of open data of 56 enterprises that operated in Ukraine in 2020. The source of obtaining panel data is the “Report on the level of transparency of Ukrainian companies” and the indicators of the enterprises included in the sample, obtained by the authors from the database: e-data. Summarize the advantages and disadvantages of contributions to the entity‟s paid capital as a source of financing investment activities. Mathematical and statistical processing of the results was carried out by the authors using correlation and regression analysis methods. Findings. As a result of assessing the relationship between the integrated ESG index and the profitability of the company's assets, we can state a moderate positive relationship between these features. A higher value of the return on assets contributes to an increase in the ESG index. In the analyzed sample, we can see that a higher value of the return on assets indicator encourages enterprises to more actively direct investments in projects and programs oriented to ESG initiatives. It is also worth noting that the ESG integral index level is influenced by other characteristics we did not evaluate in this study. Practical implications. The obtained results have a practical orientation and can use in forming the company's strategy and making investment decisions by owners, top management, and investors. Originality/value. Our study evaluates the impact of ROA on the activity of investments in projects and programs oriented to ESG initiatives. We hypothesized that this relationship intensifies as the company's profitability increases. As part of the data analysis, we test the hypothesis about the relationship between the profitability indicator: ROA and the integrated ESG index.
dc.format.extent32-40
dc.format.pages9
dc.identifier.citationКіржецька М. С. Актуальні аспекти сталого розвитку бізнесу за ESG стандартами в Україні / М. С. Кіржецька, Ю. І. Кіржецький // Вісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія “Проблеми економіки та управління”. — Львів : Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2022. — Том 6. — № 2. — С. 32–40.
dc.identifier.citationenKirzhetska M. Current aspects of sustainable business development according to esg standards in Ukraine / M. Kirzhetska, Yu. Kirzhetskyy // Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Seriia "Problemy ekonomiky ta upravlinnia". — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2022. — Vol 6. — No 2. — P. 32–40.
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.23939/semi2022.02.032
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/60472
dc.language.isouk
dc.publisherВидавництво Львівської політехніки
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofВісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія “Проблеми економіки та управління”, 2 (6), 2022
dc.relation.references1. UNEP FI, United Nations Global Compac (2016). A practical guide to ESG integration for equity investing. Output: download (unpri.org)
dc.relation.references2. KPMG (2020) Reporting on climate risks: Are you ready to meet the requirements? Output: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ie/pdf/2020/01/ie-climate-risk-reportingrequirements.pdf?msclkid=f728c3
dc.relation.references3. Mooij, S. (2017). The ESG Rating and Ranking Industry; Vice or Virtue in the Adoption of Responsible Investment? URL: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2960869
dc.relation.references4. Klein, C., CFA, Rajagopalan, R., & CEFA (2022). SDG Impact Measurement. A Brief Overview of Providers, Methodologies, Data. Output. https://d16yj43vx3i1f6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2022/02/SDG-ImpactMeasurement_Final_1219_EN.pdf
dc.relation.references5. Walley, N. and Whitehead, B. (1994). It‟s Not Easy Being Green. Harvard Business Review, 72, 46–52.
dc.relation.references6. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What‟s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.
dc.relation.references7. Porter, Michael E. and Claas van der Linde. (1995). “Toward a New Conception of the EnvironmentCompetitiveness Relationship”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4): 97–118.
dc.relation.references8.Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability Journal, 10(10), 3635.
dc.relation.references9. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64.
dc.relation.references10. Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2013). Positive and negative corporate social responsibility, financial lever age, and idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 431–448.
dc.relation.references11. Klassen, R. D. and McLaughlin, C. P. (1996) The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance. Management Science, 42, 1199–1214. Output: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1199.
dc.relation.references12. Henisz, W., Koller, T., Robin Nut, I. (2021). Five ways that ESG creates value. Output: https://www.mckinsey.com/
dc.relation.references13. CSR-Ukraine (2021). Second catalog of CSR initiatives 2020–2021. Output: https://csr-ukraine.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/11/catalog-iniciativ.pdf.
dc.relation.references14 CGPA, CSR-Ukraine, CIPE Europe and Eurasia (2021). ESG Transparency Index 2020. Output: Transp_indes_2020-FULL_ua_web.pdf (cgpa.com.ua).
dc.relation.references15. EAPF (2017). Considering ESG and climate change within EnvironmentAgency Pension Fund‟s fixed income portfolio. Output: https://www.eapf.org.uk/
dc.relation.references16. Fitch Ratings (2017). Fitch Ratings Approach to Capturing Environmental, Social and Governance Risk in Credit Ratings. Output: https://www.fitchratings.com/redirect/?q=/site/re/905806?
dc.relation.references17. Mooji, S. (2017). The ESG Rating and Ranking Industry: Vice or Virtue in the Adoption of Responsible Investment. The Journal of Environmental Investing, Vol. 8(1), pp. 331–367.
dc.relation.references18. EBA (2021). EBA report on management and supervision of esg risks for credit institutions and investment firms. Output: www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/document_library/Publications/Reports/2021/1015656
dc.relation.references19 Chalmers, J., Cox, E., Picar, N. The economic realities of ESG. Output: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/reinventing-the-future/take-on-tomorrow/download/sbpwc-2021-10-28-Economic-realities-ESG.pdf.
dc.relation.references20. Kiehne, D.-O. (2019). Environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) – also an innovation driver? Output: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334398123.
dc.relation.referencesen1. UNEP FI, United Nations Global Compac (2016). A practical guide to ESG integration for equity investing. Output: download (unpri.org).
dc.relation.referencesen2. KPMG (2020) Reporting on climate risks: Are you ready to meet the requirements? Output: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ie/pdf/2020/01/ie-climate-risk-reportingrequirements.pdf?msclkid=f728c3bdcf8c11ecada98f984de0c4d7.
dc.relation.referencesen3. Mooij, S. (2017). The ESG Rating and Ranking Industry; Vice or Virtue in the Adoption of Responsible Investment? URL: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2960869
dc.relation.referencesen4. Klein, C., CFA, Rajagopalan, R., & CEFA (2022). SDG Impact Measurement. A Brief Overview of Providers, Methodologies, Data. Output. https://d16yj43vx3i1f6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2022/02/SDG-ImpactMeasurement_Final_1219_EN.pdf
dc.relation.referencesen5. Walley, N. and Whitehead, B. (1994). It‟s Not Easy Being Green. Harvard Business Review, 72, 46–52.
dc.relation.referencesen6. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What‟s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.
dc.relation.referencesen7. Porter, Michael E., and Claas van der Linde. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the EnvironmentCompetitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4): 97–118.
dc.relation.referencesen8.Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability Journal, 10(10), 3635.
dc.relation.referencesen9. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64.
dc.relation.referencesen10. Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2013). Positive and negative corporate social responsibility, financial lever age, and idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 431–448.
dc.relation.referencesen11. Klassen, R. D. and McLaughlin, C. P. (1996) The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance. Management Science, 42, 1199–1214. Output: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1199.
dc.relation.referencesen12. Henisz, W., Koller, T., Robin Nut, I. (2021). Five ways that ESG creates value Output: https://www.mckinsey.com/
dc.relation.referencesen13. CSR-Ukraine (2021). Second catalog of CSR initiatives 2020–2021. Output: https://csr-ukraine.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/11/catalog-iniciativ.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesen14 CGPA, CSR-Ukraine, CIPE Europe and Eurasia (2021). ESG Transparency Index 2020. Output: Transp_indes_2020-FULL_ua_web.pdf (cgpa.com.ua).
dc.relation.referencesen15. EAPF (2017). Considering ESG and climate change within EnvironmentAgency Pension Fund‟s fixed income portfolio. Output: https://www.eapf.org.uk/
dc.relation.referencesen16. Fitch Ratings (2017). Fitch Ratings Approach to Capturing Environmental, Social and Governance Risk in Credit Ratings, Output: https://www.fitchratings.com/redirect/?q=/site/re/905806?
dc.relation.referencesen17. Mooji, S. (2017). The ESG Rating and Ranking Industry: Vice or Virtue in the Adoption of Responsible Investment. The Journal of Environmental Investing, Vol. 8(1), pp. 331–367.
dc.relation.referencesen18. EBA (2021). EBA report on management and supervision of esg risks for credit institutions and investment firms. Output: https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/document_library/Publications/Reports/2021/1015656
dc.relation.referencesen19 Chalmers, J., Cox, E., Picar, N. The economic realities of ESG. Output: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/reinventing-the-future/take-on-tomorrow/download/sbpwc-2021-10-28-Economic-realities-ESG.pdf
dc.relation.referencesen20. Kiehne, D.-O. (2019). Environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) – also an innovation driver? Output: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334398123
dc.relation.urihttps://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ie/pdf/2020/01/ie-climate-risk-reportingrequirements.pdf?msclkid=f728c3
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2960869
dc.relation.urihttps://d16yj43vx3i1f6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2022/02/SDG-ImpactMeasurement_Final_1219_EN.pdf
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1199
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mckinsey.com/
dc.relation.urihttps://csr-ukraine.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/11/catalog-iniciativ.pdf
dc.relation.urihttps://www.eapf.org.uk/
dc.relation.urihttps://www.fitchratings.com/redirect/?q=/site/re/905806?
dc.relation.urihttps://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/reinventing-the-future/take-on-tomorrow/download/sbpwc-2021-10-28-Economic-realities-ESG.pdf
dc.relation.urihttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/334398123
dc.relation.urihttps://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ie/pdf/2020/01/ie-climate-risk-reportingrequirements.pdf?msclkid=f728c3bdcf8c11ecada98f984de0c4d7
dc.relation.urihttps://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/document_library/Publications/Reports/2021/1015656
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2022
dc.rights.holder© Кіржецька М. С., Кіржецький Ю. І., 2022
dc.subjectESG-стратегія/цілі
dc.subjectрентабельність активів
dc.subjectіндекс ESG
dc.subjectфункціональні зв’язки
dc.subjectESG strategy/goals
dc.subjectreturn on assets
dc.subjectESG index
dc.subjectfunctional relationships
dc.subject.jelM14
dc.subject.udc316.472.47
dc.titleАктуальні аспекти сталого розвитку бізнесу за ESG стандартами в Україні
dc.title.alternativeCurrent aspects of sustainable business development according to esg standards in Ukraine
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022v6n2_Kirzhetska_M-Current_aspects_of_sustainable_32-40.pdf
Size:
2.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022v6n2_Kirzhetska_M-Current_aspects_of_sustainable_32-40__COVER.png
Size:
404.34 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.81 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: