Конвенція про захист прав людини і основоположних свобод у рішеннях судів у справі Urgenda
| dc.citation.epage | 300 | |
| dc.citation.issue | 2 | |
| dc.citation.journalTitle | Вісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Юридичні науки | |
| dc.citation.spage | 295 | |
| dc.citation.volume | 7 | |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Національний університет “Львівська політехніка” | |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Lviv Polytechnic National University | |
| dc.contributor.author | Тарнавська, Мар`яна | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tarnavska, Maryana | |
| dc.coverage.placename | Львів | |
| dc.coverage.placename | Lviv | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-19T10:32:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-01-19T10:32:14Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2020-02-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-02-24 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Проаналізовано рішення Верховного Суду Нідерландів у справі за позовом громадської організації Urgenda. Виокремлено аргументи судів різних інстанцій щодо можливості застосування норм Конвенції про захист прав людини та основоположних свобод у справах з приводу кліматичних змін. Констатовано, що Суд апеляційної інстанції та Верховний Суд Нідерландів застосували ст. 2 і 8 Конвенції у їх класичному розумінні Європейським Судом з прав людини. | |
| dc.description.abstract | The article analyzes the decision of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands in a case brought by a NGO Urgenda. The arguments of the courts of different instances regarding the possibility of applying the rules of the European Convention of Human Rights in the cases of climate change are highlighted. It is stated that the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of the Netherlands have applied Art. 2 and 8 of the Convention in their classic sense by the European Court of Human Rights. | |
| dc.format.extent | 295-300 | |
| dc.format.pages | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Тарнавська М. Конвенція про захист прав людини і основоположних свобод у рішеннях судів у справі Urgenda / Мар`яна Тарнавська // Вісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Юридичні науки. — Львів : Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2020. — Том 7. — № 2. — С. 295–300. | |
| dc.identifier.citationen | Tarnavska M. European convention of human rights in judgments in Urgenda case / Maryana Tarnavska // Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Serie: Yurydychni nauky. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2020. — Vol 7. — No 2. — P. 295–300. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | doi.org/10.23939/law2020.26.295 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/55891 | |
| dc.language.iso | uk | |
| dc.publisher | Видавництво Львівської політехніки | |
| dc.publisher | Lviv Politechnic Publishing House | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Вісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Юридичні науки, 2 (7), 2020 | |
| dc.relation.references | 1. Рабінович П. М. Основи загальної теорії права та держави. Львів: Край, 2007. 192 с. | |
| dc.relation.references | 2. Verdict 24-06-2015. ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196 Rechtbank Den Haag, 24-06-2015, C/09/456689/ HA ZA 13-1396 (English translation). URL: https://www.urgenda.nl/en/themas/climate-case/ | |
| dc.relation.references | 3. Judgment the Hague Court of Appeal 9-10-2018.ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2018:2610. Gerechtshof Den Haag, 09-10-2018, 200.178.245/01 (Engelse vertaling). URL: https://www.urgenda.nl/en/themas/climate-case/ | |
| dc.relation.references | 4. Uitspraak 20-12-2019. ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007. Hoge Raad. (English translation). URL:https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007 | |
| dc.relation.references | 5. Geetanjali Ganguly, Joana Setzer, Veerle Heyvaert. If at First You Don’t Succeed: Suing Corporations for Climate Change. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Volume 38, Issue 4, Winter 2018, Pages 841–868. | |
| dc.relation.references | 6. Sands Phillippe Climate Change and the Rule of Law: Adjudication the Future in International Law. Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 28, Issue 1, 1 March 2016, P.19-35. | |
| dc.relation.references | 7. Ucilia Wang. Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling URL: https://i-care-movement.org/index.php/2018/05/24/netherlands-works-to-overturn-landmark-urgendaclimate-ruling/ | |
| dc.relation.references | 8. Peeters Marjan Case Note Urgenda Foundation and 886 Individuals v. The State of Netherlands: The Dilemma of More Ambitious Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action by EU Members States. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 25 (1) 2016. P. 123-130. | |
| dc.relation.references | 9.S oila Apparicio Netherlands Climate Lawsuit goes to Court of Appeals.Climate Home News. 28 may 2018. URL: https://www.climatechangenews.com/2018/05/28/netherlands-climate-lawsuit-goes-court-appeals/ | |
| dc.relation.references | 10. Ottavio Quirico Systemic integration between climate change and human rights in international law? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2017.Vol. 35 (1). P. 31-50. | |
| dc.relation.references | 11.Marc A. Loth. To big to trial? Lessons from the Urgenda case. Uniform Law Review. 23, 2. 336-353 p. | |
| dc.relation.references | 12.Marcus Dȕwel, Gerhard Bos. Human right and future people – Possibilities of argumentation. Journal of Human Rights. 2016, Vol.15, No. 2. P. 231-250. | |
| dc.relation.references | 13.Dotto Valentina. The use of tort law in climate litigation: The Urgenda case. Iapss.org/2018/06/20/the-use-of-tort-law-in-climate-litigation-the-urgenda-case/ | |
| dc.relation.references | 14. European Convention of Human Rights. URL: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_Eng.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | 15. Protocol No. 16to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental FreedomsURL: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Protocol_16_ENG.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | 16. United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992)URL: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 1. Rabinovych P. Osnovy zahalnoi teorii prava ta derzhavy [Fundamentals of the general theory of law and state]. Lviv, KrajPubl., 2007. 192pp. | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 2. Verdict 24-06-2015. ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196 Rechtbank Den Haag, 24-06-2015, C/09/456689/ HA ZA 13-1396 (English translation). URL: https://www.urgenda.nl/en/themas/climate-case/ | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 3.Judgment the Hague Court of Appeal 9-10-2018.ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2018:2610. Gerechtshof Den Haag, 09-10-2018, 200.178.245/01 (Engelse vertaling). URL: https://www.urgenda.nl/en/themas/climate-case/ | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 4.Uitspraak 20-12- 2019. ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007. Hoge Raad. (English translation). URL:https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007 | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 5. Geetanjali Ganguly, Joana Setzer, Veerle Heyvaert. If at First You Don’t Succeed: Suing Corporations for Climate Change. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Volume 38, Issue 4, Winter 2018, Pages 841–868. | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 6. Sands Phillippe Climate Change and the Rule of Law: Adjudication the Future in International Law. Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 28, Issue 1, 1 March 2016, P.19-35. | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 7. Ucilia Wang. Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling URL: https://i-caremovement.org/index.php/2018/05/24/netherlands-works-to-overturn-landmark-urgenda-climate-ruling/ | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 8.Peeters Marjan Case Note Urgenda Foundation and 886 Individuals v. The State of Netherlands: The Dilemma of More Ambitious Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action by EU Members States. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 25 (1) 2016. P. 123-130. | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 9.Soila Apparicio Netherlands Climate Lawsuit goes to Court of Appeals.Climate Home News. 28 may 2018. URL: https://www.climatechangenews.com/2018/05/28/netherlands-climate-lawsuit-goes-court-appeals/ | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 10. Ottavio Quirico Systemic integration between climate change and human rights in international law? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2017.Vol. 35 (1). P. 31-50. | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 11.Marc A. Loth. To big to trial? Lessons from the Urgenda case. Uniform Law Review. 23, 2. 336-353 p. | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 12.Marcus Dȕwel, Gerhard Bos. Human right and future people – Possibilities of argumentation. Journal of Human Rights. 2016, Vol.15, No. 2. P. 231-250. | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 13.Dotto Valentina. The use of tort law in climate litigation: The Urgenda case. Iapss.org/2018/06/20/the-use-of-tort-law-in-climate-litigation-the-urgendacase/ | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 14.European Convention of Human Rights. URL: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_Eng.pdf | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 15.Protocol No. 16to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental FreedomsURL: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Protocol_16_ENG.pdf | |
| dc.relation.referencesen | 16.United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992)URL: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://www.urgenda.nl/en/themas/climate-case/ | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007 | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://i-care-movement.org/index.php/2018/05/24/netherlands-works-to-overturn-landmark-urgendaclimate-ruling/ | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://www.climatechangenews.com/2018/05/28/netherlands-climate-lawsuit-goes-court-appeals/ | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_Eng.pdf | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Protocol_16_ENG.pdf | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://i-caremovement.org/index.php/2018/05/24/netherlands-works-to-overturn-landmark-urgenda-climate-ruling/ | |
| dc.rights.holder | © Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2020 | |
| dc.rights.holder | © Тарнавська М., 2020 | |
| dc.subject | судова практика | |
| dc.subject | глобальне потепління | |
| dc.subject | Urgenda | |
| dc.subject | Верховний Суд Нідерландів | |
| dc.subject | Конвенція про захист прав людини та основоположних свобод | |
| dc.subject | judicial practice | |
| dc.subject | global warming | |
| dc.subject | Urgenda | |
| dc.subject | the Supreme Court of the Netherlands | |
| dc.subject | European Convention of Human Rights | |
| dc.subject.udc | 349.6 | |
| dc.title | Конвенція про захист прав людини і основоположних свобод у рішеннях судів у справі Urgenda | |
| dc.title.alternative | European convention of human rights in judgments in Urgenda case | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1