Comparison of the methods of surface runoff modelling from the urbanized subcatchments for estimation of peak loads on the environment

Simple item page
dc.citation.epage6
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage1
dc.citation.volume5
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.authorMysak, Ihor
dc.contributor.authorZhuk, Volodymyr
dc.contributor.authorPetrushka, Kateryna
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-13T13:27:09Z
dc.date.available2020-12-13T13:27:09Z
dc.date.created2020-02-10
dc.date.issued2020-02-10
dc.description.abstractStormwater hydrographs from the typical urban impervious subcatchments are analyzed theoretically using the nonlinear reservoir method and the sector method. The peak flow rates of hydrographs from the impervious rectangular subcatchments are 0.774 times less using the nonlinear reservoir method comparing the sector method for all investigated input parameters.
dc.format.extent1-6
dc.format.pages6
dc.identifier.citationMysak I. Comparison of the methods of surface runoff modelling from the urbanized subcatchments for estimation of peak loads on the environment / Ihor Mysak, Volodymyr Zhuk, Kateryna Petrushka // Environmental Problems. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2020. — Vol 5. — No 1. — P. 1–6.
dc.identifier.citationenMysak I. Comparison of the methods of surface runoff modelling from the urbanized subcatchments for estimation of peak loads on the environment / Ihor Mysak, Volodymyr Zhuk, Kateryna Petrushka // Environmental Problems. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2020. — Vol 5. — No 1. — P. 1–6.
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.23939/ep2020.01.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/55669
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherВидавництво Львівської політехніки
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Problems, 1 (5), 2020
dc.relation.references[1] European waters. Assessment of status and pressures 2018. EEA Report No7/2018. European Envir. Agency. 2018, 85.
dc.relation.references[2] Masikevych A., Malovanyy M., Yaremchuk V., Kolotylo M., Masikevych Y.: J. Envir. Probl., 2018, 3(4), 265.
dc.relation.references[3] IurchenkoV.,MelnikovaO.,MikhalevichN.,BorzenkoO.: J. Envir. Probl., 2019, 4 (2), 74. https://doi.org/10.23939/ep2019.02.074
dc.relation.references[4] James W., Rossman L.: Water systems models. User’s guide to SWMM 5, 13th ed. CHI Press Publication, Ontario, Canada. 2010, 905.
dc.relation.references[5] Tkachuk S. G. and Zhuk V. M.: Reghuljuvannja doshchovogho stoku v systemakh vodovidvedennja: monoghrafija. Vydavnyctvo Lvivskoji politekhniky, Lviv 2012. (in Ukrainian)
dc.relation.references[6] Borah D. K.: Hydrol. Proces., 2011, 25, 3472.
dc.relation.references[7] Hromadka T. V.: Environ.Software, 1990, 5 (2), 82.
dc.relation.references[8] Moradkhani H.: General review of rainfall-runoff modeling: model calibration, data assimilation, and uncertainty analysis [in:] Sorooshian S., Hsu K. L., Coppola E., Tomassetti B., Verdecchia M., Visconti G. (Ed.), Hydrological Modelling and the Water Cycle. Water Science and Technology Library. Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009, 63, 1−24.
dc.relation.references[9] Xiong Y., Melching C.S.: J. Hydrol. Eng., 2005, 10(1), 39.
dc.relation.references[10] Zhuk V. M.: Visn. Nats. Univ. Lviv Polytechnic “Theory and Practice of Construction”, 2007, 602, 61. (in Ukrainian)
dc.relation.references[11] Berko A., Zhuk V., Sereda I.: J. Envir. Probl., 2017, 2 (2), 97.
dc.relation.references[12] Wang K. H., Altunkaynak A.: J. Hydrol. Eng. 2012, 17(2), 281.
dc.relation.references[13] Zhuk V. M., Matlai I. I.: Probl. of Water Supply, Sewerage and Hydraulics, 2012, 19, 31. (in Ukrainian)
dc.relation.referencesen[1] European waters. Assessment of status and pressures 2018. EEA Report No7/2018. European Envir. Agency. 2018, 85.
dc.relation.referencesen[2] Masikevych A., Malovanyy M., Yaremchuk V., Kolotylo M., Masikevych Y., J. Envir. Probl., 2018, 3(4), 265.
dc.relation.referencesen[3] IurchenkoV.,MelnikovaO.,MikhalevichN.,BorzenkoO., J. Envir. Probl., 2019, 4 (2), 74. https://doi.org/10.23939/ep2019.02.074
dc.relation.referencesen[4] James W., Rossman L., Water systems models. User’s guide to SWMM 5, 13th ed. CHI Press Publication, Ontario, Canada. 2010, 905.
dc.relation.referencesen[5] Tkachuk S. G. and Zhuk V. M., Reghuljuvannja doshchovogho stoku v systemakh vodovidvedennja: monoghrafija. Vydavnyctvo Lvivskoji politekhniky, Lviv 2012. (in Ukrainian)
dc.relation.referencesen[6] Borah D. K., Hydrol. Proces., 2011, 25, 3472.
dc.relation.referencesen[7] Hromadka T. V., Environ.Software, 1990, 5 (2), 82.
dc.relation.referencesen[8] Moradkhani H., General review of rainfall-runoff modeling: model calibration, data assimilation, and uncertainty analysis [in:] Sorooshian S., Hsu K. L., Coppola E., Tomassetti B., Verdecchia M., Visconti G. (Ed.), Hydrological Modelling and the Water Cycle. Water Science and Technology Library. Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009, 63, 1−24.
dc.relation.referencesen[9] Xiong Y., Melching C.S., J. Hydrol. Eng., 2005, 10(1), 39.
dc.relation.referencesen[10] Zhuk V. M., Visn. Nats. Univ. Lviv Polytechnic "Theory and Practice of Construction", 2007, 602, 61. (in Ukrainian)
dc.relation.referencesen[11] Berko A., Zhuk V., Sereda I., J. Envir. Probl., 2017, 2 (2), 97.
dc.relation.referencesen[12] Wang K. H., Altunkaynak A., J. Hydrol. Eng. 2012, 17(2), 281.
dc.relation.referencesen[13] Zhuk V. M., Matlai I. I., Probl. of Water Supply, Sewerage and Hydraulics, 2012, 19, 31. (in Ukrainian)
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.23939/ep2019.02.074
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2020
dc.rights.holder© Mysak I., Zhuk V., Petrushka K., 2020
dc.subjectsurface runoff
dc.subjectimpervious subcatchment
dc.subjectnonlinear reservoir method
dc.subjectsector method
dc.subjectstormwater hydrograph
dc.titleComparison of the methods of surface runoff modelling from the urbanized subcatchments for estimation of peak loads on the environment
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2020v5n1_Mysak_I-Comparison_of_the_methods_of_1-6.pdf
Size:
319.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2020v5n1_Mysak_I-Comparison_of_the_methods_of_1-6__COVER.png
Size:
449.78 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.97 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Environmental Problems. – 2020. – Vol. 5, No. 1