Assessment of the service quality in public transport (analysis of research in Lviv, Ukraine)

dc.citation.epage22
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.journalTitleТранспортні технології
dc.citation.spage12
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.authorZhuk, Mykola
dc.contributor.authorPivtorak, Halyna
dc.contributor.authorGits, Ivanna
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T07:50:12Z
dc.date.available2024-02-22T07:50:12Z
dc.date.created2023-02-28
dc.date.issued2023-02-28
dc.description.abstractВ роботі здійснено оцінювання якості надання послуг громадського транспорту та впливу окремих компонентів на значення загального рівня задоволеності транспортним обслуговуванням. Громадський транспорт має багато переваг щодо енергозбереження, впливу на навколишнє середовище, соціальної справедливості та міської економіки. Аналіз виконаних досліджень підтверджує, що якість надання послуг системою громадського транспорту безпосередньо впливає на наміри потенційних пасажирів більше ним користуватися. Проте рівень економічного добробуту, стан розвитку транспортної системи, національна стратегія щодо розвитку соціальної мобільності тощо впливають на різне сприйняття важливості тих самих параметрів функціонування громадського транспорту. Дослідження ґрунтуються на результатах опитувань населення м. Львова. Виявлено, що сприйняття показників вартості (ціни та способів оплати проїзду) найбільше відрізняється залежно від віку, середньомісячного рівня доходу та виду зайнятості. Найменше соціо-економічні показники респондентів впливають на зміну оцінки часових показників переміщення. В цьому випадку рівень задоволеності корелює із фактичними тривалостями окремих компонентів переміщення (тривалості поїздки та тривалості очікування на зупинці). Згідно з результатами опитувань, часові параметри переміщення, заповненість салону транспортного засобу, чистота в салоні та поведінка водія істотніше впливають на загальну оцінку показника якості транспортного обслуговування, ніж облаштування зупинки, зручність посадки/висадки, шум в салоні та зручність оплати проїзду. Отримані результати можуть бути корисними для надавачів та замовників транспортних послуг під час визначення першочергових заходів для поліпшення якості громадського транспорту.
dc.description.abstractThe paper assesses the quality of public transport services and the influence of individual components on the value of the overall satisfaction level with transport services. Public transport has many benefits in terms of energy savings, environmental impact, social equity and urban economy. The analysis of existing research confirms that the quality of service provided by the public transport system affects the intentions of potential passengers to use it more. However, the level of economic well-being, the state of development of the transport system, and the national strategy for developing social mobility influence the different perceptions of the importance of similar parameters of public transport functioning. The research was conducted based on the results of surveys of the population of Lviv. It was found that the perception of value indicators (fare and methods of paying for travel) differs the most depending on age, average monthly income and type of employment. The socio-economic indicators of the respondents have the least influence on the change in the estimation of time indicators of displacement. In this case, the level of satisfaction correlates with the actual durations of individual components of the movement (the time of the trip and the waiting time at the stop). According to the results of the surveys, the time parameters of the movement, the occupancy of the vehicle, the cleanliness of the vehicle, and the behavior of the driver have more influence on the overall assessment of the transport service quality indicator than the equipment of the stop, the convenience of boarding/alighting, the noise in the vehicle, and the convenience of paying for the fare. The obtained results can be useful for providers and customers of transport services when determining priority measures to improve the quality of public transport.
dc.format.extent12-22
dc.format.pages11
dc.identifier.citationZhuk M. Assessment of the service quality in public transport (analysis of research in Lviv, Ukraine) / Mykola Zhuk, Halyna Pivtorak, Ivanna Gits // Transport Technologies. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2023. — Vol 4. — No 2. — P. 12–22.
dc.identifier.citationenZhuk M. Assessment of the service quality in public transport (analysis of research in Lviv, Ukraine) / Mykola Zhuk, Halyna Pivtorak, Ivanna Gits // Transport Technologies. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2023. — Vol 4. — No 2. — P. 12–22.
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.23939/tt2023.02.012
dc.identifier.issn2708-2199
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/61383
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherВидавництво Львівської політехніки
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofТранспортні технології, 2 (4), 2023
dc.relation.ispartofTransport Technologies, 2 (4), 2023
dc.relation.references1. Ojo, T. K. (2019). Quality of public transport service: An integrative review and research agenda. Transportation Letters, 11(2), 104-116. doi: 10.1080/19427867.2017.1283835 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1283835
dc.relation.references2. Cruz, I. S., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2016). Urban public transport companies and strategies to promote sustainable consumption practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.007 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.007
dc.relation.references3. Van Lierop, D., Badami, M. G., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2018). What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature. Transport Reviews, 38(1), 52-72. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683
dc.relation.references4. Mugion, R. G., Toni, M., Raharjo, H., Di Pietro, L., & Sebathu, S. P. (2018). Does the service quality of urban public transport enhance sustainable mobility?. Journal of cleaner production, 174, 1566-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.052 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.052
dc.relation.references5. Dell ́Olio, L., Ibeas, A., de Ona, J., & de Ona, R. (2017). Public transportation quality of service: Factors, models, and applications. 232 p. Elsevier. (in English).
dc.relation.references6. Göransson, J., & Andersson, H. (2023). Factors that make public transport systems attractive: a review of travel preferences and travel mode choices. European Transport Research Review, 15(1), 32. doi: 10.1186/s12544-023-00609-x (in English). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-023-00609-x
dc.relation.references7. Hansson, J., Pettersson, F., Svensson, H., & Wretstrand, A. (2019). Preferences in regional public transport: a literature review. European Transport Research Review, 11(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1186/s12544-019-0374-4 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0374-4
dc.relation.references8. Bubalo, T., & Rajsman, M. (2020). Quality of Transport Service in Intercity Road Passenger Transport: A Literature Review. Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering Vol, 8(1). doi: 10.18178/jtle.8.1.18-28 (in English). https://doi.org/10.18178/jtle.8.1.18-28
dc.relation.references9. McCarthy, L., Delbosc, A., Currie, G., & Molloy, A. (2017). Factors influencing travel mode choice among families with young children (aged 0-4): a review of the literature. Transport reviews, 37(6), 767-781. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1354942 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1354942
dc.relation.references10. Jamal, S., & Newbold, K. B. (2020). Factors associated with travel behavior of millennials and older adults: A scoping review. Sustainability, 12(19), 8236. doi: 10.3390/su12198236 (in English). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198236
dc.relation.references11. Bláfoss Ingvardson, J., Kaplan, S., de Abreu e Silva, J., Di Ciommo, F., Shiftan, Y., & Nielsen, O. A. (2020). Existence, relatedness and growth needs as mediators between mode choice and travel satisfaction: evidence from Denmark. Transportation, 47, 337-358. doi: 10.1007/s11116-018-9886-3 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9886-3
dc.relation.references12. Dubernet, I., & Axhausen, K. W. (2020). The German value of time and value of reliability study: the survey work. Transportation, 47(3), 1477-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11116-019-10052-4 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10052-4
dc.relation.references13. Garrido, C., De Oña, R., & De Oña, J. (2014). Neural networks for analyzing service quality in public transportation. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(15), 6830-6838. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.045 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.045
dc.relation.references14. Guirao, B., García-Pastor, A., & López-Lambas, M. E. (2016). The importance of service quality attributes in public transportation: Narrowing the gap between scientific research and practitioners' needs. Transport Policy, 49, 68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.003 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.003
dc.relation.references15. Börjesson, M., & Rubensson, I. (2019). Satisfaction with crowding and other attributes in public transport. Transport policy, 79, 213-222. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.010 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.010
dc.relation.references16. Tanko, M., Cheemakurthy, H., Kihl, S. H., & Garme, K. (2019). Water transit passenger perceptions and planning factors: A Swedish perspective. Travel Behaviour and Society, 16, 23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2019.02.002 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.02.002
dc.relation.references17. Dos Santos, J. B., & Lima, J. P. (2021). Quality of public transportation based on the multi-criteria approach and from the perspective of user's satisfaction level: A case study in a Brazilian city. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3), 1233-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.015 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.015
dc.relation.references18. Birago, D., Mensah, S. O., & Sharma, S. (2017). Level of service delivery of public transport and mode choice in Accra, Ghana. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 46, 284-300. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.033 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.033
dc.relation.references19. Moslem, S., Alkharabsheh, A., Ismael, K., & Duleba, S. (2020). An integrated decision support model for evaluating public transport quality. Applied Sciences, 10(12), 4158. doi: 10.3390/app10124158 (in English). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124158
dc.relation.references20. Wang, Y., Cao, M., Liu, Y., Ye, R., Gao, X., & Ma, L. (2022). Public transport equity in Shenyang: Using structural equation modelling. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 42, 100555. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100555 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100555
dc.relation.referencesen1. Ojo, T. K. (2019). Quality of public transport service: An integrative review and research agenda. Transportation Letters, 11(2), 104-116. doi: 10.1080/19427867.2017.1283835 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1283835
dc.relation.referencesen2. Cruz, I. S., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2016). Urban public transport companies and strategies to promote sustainable consumption practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.007 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.007
dc.relation.referencesen3. Van Lierop, D., Badami, M. G., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2018). What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature. Transport Reviews, 38(1), 52-72. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683
dc.relation.referencesen4. Mugion, R. G., Toni, M., Raharjo, H., Di Pietro, L., & Sebathu, S. P. (2018). Does the service quality of urban public transport enhance sustainable mobility?. Journal of cleaner production, 174, 1566-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.052 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.052
dc.relation.referencesen5. Dell ́Olio, L., Ibeas, A., de Ona, J., & de Ona, R. (2017). Public transportation quality of service: Factors, models, and applications. 232 p. Elsevier. (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen6. Göransson, J., & Andersson, H. (2023). Factors that make public transport systems attractive: a review of travel preferences and travel mode choices. European Transport Research Review, 15(1), 32. doi: 10.1186/s12544-023-00609-x (in English). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-023-00609-x
dc.relation.referencesen7. Hansson, J., Pettersson, F., Svensson, H., & Wretstrand, A. (2019). Preferences in regional public transport: a literature review. European Transport Research Review, 11(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1186/s12544-019-0374-4 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0374-4
dc.relation.referencesen8. Bubalo, T., & Rajsman, M. (2020). Quality of Transport Service in Intercity Road Passenger Transport: A Literature Review. Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering Vol, 8(1). doi: 10.18178/jtle.8.1.18-28 (in English). https://doi.org/10.18178/jtle.8.1.18-28
dc.relation.referencesen9. McCarthy, L., Delbosc, A., Currie, G., & Molloy, A. (2017). Factors influencing travel mode choice among families with young children (aged 0-4): a review of the literature. Transport reviews, 37(6), 767-781. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1354942 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1354942
dc.relation.referencesen10. Jamal, S., & Newbold, K. B. (2020). Factors associated with travel behavior of millennials and older adults: A scoping review. Sustainability, 12(19), 8236. doi: 10.3390/su12198236 (in English). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198236
dc.relation.referencesen11. Bláfoss Ingvardson, J., Kaplan, S., de Abreu e Silva, J., Di Ciommo, F., Shiftan, Y., & Nielsen, O. A. (2020). Existence, relatedness and growth needs as mediators between mode choice and travel satisfaction: evidence from Denmark. Transportation, 47, 337-358. doi: 10.1007/s11116-018-9886-3 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9886-3
dc.relation.referencesen12. Dubernet, I., & Axhausen, K. W. (2020). The German value of time and value of reliability study: the survey work. Transportation, 47(3), 1477-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11116-019-10052-4 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10052-4
dc.relation.referencesen13. Garrido, C., De Oña, R., & De Oña, J. (2014). Neural networks for analyzing service quality in public transportation. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(15), 6830-6838. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.045 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.045
dc.relation.referencesen14. Guirao, B., García-Pastor, A., & López-Lambas, M. E. (2016). The importance of service quality attributes in public transportation: Narrowing the gap between scientific research and practitioners' needs. Transport Policy, 49, 68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.003 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.003
dc.relation.referencesen15. Börjesson, M., & Rubensson, I. (2019). Satisfaction with crowding and other attributes in public transport. Transport policy, 79, 213-222. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.010 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.010
dc.relation.referencesen16. Tanko, M., Cheemakurthy, H., Kihl, S. H., & Garme, K. (2019). Water transit passenger perceptions and planning factors: A Swedish perspective. Travel Behaviour and Society, 16, 23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2019.02.002 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.02.002
dc.relation.referencesen17. Dos Santos, J. B., & Lima, J. P. (2021). Quality of public transportation based on the multi-criteria approach and from the perspective of user's satisfaction level: A case study in a Brazilian city. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3), 1233-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.015 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.015
dc.relation.referencesen18. Birago, D., Mensah, S. O., & Sharma, S. (2017). Level of service delivery of public transport and mode choice in Accra, Ghana. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 46, 284-300. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.033 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.033
dc.relation.referencesen19. Moslem, S., Alkharabsheh, A., Ismael, K., & Duleba, S. (2020). An integrated decision support model for evaluating public transport quality. Applied Sciences, 10(12), 4158. doi: 10.3390/app10124158 (in English). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124158
dc.relation.referencesen20. Wang, Y., Cao, M., Liu, Y., Ye, R., Gao, X., & Ma, L. (2022). Public transport equity in Shenyang: Using structural equation modelling. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 42, 100555. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100555 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100555
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1283835
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.007
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.052
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-023-00609-x
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0374-4
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.18178/jtle.8.1.18-28
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1354942
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su12198236
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9886-3
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10052-4
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.045
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.003
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.010
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.02.002
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.015
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.033
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app10124158
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100555
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2023
dc.rights.holder© M. Zhuk, H. Pivtorak, I. Gits, 2023
dc.subjectгромадський транспорт
dc.subjectякість обслуговування
dc.subjectрівень забезпечення потреб
dc.subjectтривалість руху
dc.subjectтривалість очікування
dc.subjectpublic transport
dc.subjectservice quality
dc.subjectsatisfaction level
dc.subjecttravel time
dc.subjectwaiting time
dc.subjectsocio-economic indicators
dc.titleAssessment of the service quality in public transport (analysis of research in Lviv, Ukraine)
dc.title.alternativeОцінка якості надання послуг громадським транспортом (аналіз досліджень у Львові, Україна)
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023v4n2_Zhuk_M-Assessment_of_the_service_quality_12-22.pdf
Size:
427.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023v4n2_Zhuk_M-Assessment_of_the_service_quality_12-22__COVER.png
Size:
438.6 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.77 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: