Formation of sectorial model of Ukrainian economy at the post-war period

Simple item page
dc.citation.epage99
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.journalTitleВісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія “Проблеми економіки та управління”
dc.citation.spage90
dc.contributor.affiliationНаціональний університет “Львівська політехніка”
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.authorПирог, О. В.
dc.contributor.authorPyroh, O. V.
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-02T08:47:12Z
dc.date.available2023-11-02T08:47:12Z
dc.date.created2022-03-01
dc.date.issued2022-03-01
dc.description.abstractУ статті досліджено трансформацію секторної моделі економіки України у 2001–2020 рр. та формування нової структури секторної моделі у поствоєнний період. Секторна модель розвитку національного господарства комплексно відображає організацію економічної системи за технологічною інтенсивністю й суспільними потребами в умовах постіндустріального суспільства, враховує структурно-технологічні зміни національного господарства. У ході дослідження сформовано гіпотезу: Україна постала перед завданням із формування нової секторної моделі національної економіки з потужними вторинним (S2) і п’ятериковим (S5) секторами, які посилять конкурентоспроможність країни на глобальному рівні у поствоєнний період. Здійснено оцінювання структурних змін секторної моделі економіки України відповідно до новітніх вимог постіндустріального суспільства в умовах нестабільності (2001–2020 рр.). Розвитку національної економіки України відповідно до вимог постіндустріального суспільства можливо досягти, сформувавши у післявоєнний період сучасну секторну модель, яка передбачає зменшення частки первинного (S1) і третинного (S3) секторів зі зростанням часток вторинного (S2) і п’ятерикового (S5) секторів, у яких зосереджено високотехнологічне виробництво.
dc.description.abstractPurpose of the article is the empirical research of the development of sectorial models of national economies at globalization and to provide some recommendations for transformation of sectorial model of Ukraine at the post-war period. The hypothesis is that Ukraine has a chose to form a new sectorial model of national economy with powerful Secondary (S2) and Quinary (S5) sectors that will push country to become global competitively in the terms of the post-industrial society development at the post-war period. The methods of scientific research were applied to research the economic models and the structural changes of countries: theoretical generalization (to systematize scientific research of sectorial model and to formulate the conclusions), empirical method and methods of statistical analysis (to determine the structure of sectorial model of national economies of the world; to compare the level of the national economies’ development in the world and Ukraine and the their national economies’ structure via specific sectors; to simulate the sectorіal model of the national economy of Ukraine). The development of Ukraine towards post-industrial society can be achieved by forming a modern sectorial model at postwar period. The model involves economic complexity, such as reducing the proportion of Primary (S1) and Tertiary (S3) sectors, and increasing proportion of the Secondary (S2) and Quinary (S5) sectors, which are concentrated on high-tech economic activities of material and non-material production. Development of Ukraine at the level of the countries with innovative economies involves the formation and development of sectorial model, which would be able to occupy strategic places in the global economy. The research highlights the elements of the methodological system of choosing and forming the sectorial model for national economy’s development at the conditions of post-war period, based on macro-forecasting of the country's development was carried out in accordance with strategic economic tasks. The obtained results impact to develop the recommendations for the formation and implementation of modern sectorial model of Ukrainian economy at the conditions of post-war period.
dc.format.extent90-99
dc.format.pages10
dc.identifier.citationPyroh O. V. Formation of sectorial model of Ukrainian economy at the post-war period / O. V. Pyroh // Вісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія “Проблеми економіки та управління”. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2022. — Vol 6. — No 2. — P. 90–99.
dc.identifier.citationenPyroh O. V. Formation of sectorial model of Ukrainian economy at the post-war period / O. V. Pyroh // Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Seriia "Problemy ekonomiky ta upravlinnia". — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2022. — Vol 6. — No 2. — P. 90–99.
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.23939/semi2022.02.090
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/60476
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherВидавництво Львівської політехніки
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofВісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія “Проблеми економіки та управління”, 2 (6), 2022
dc.relation.references1. Rodrik D. (2014). The Past, Present and Future of Economic Growth. Challenge, Vol. 57 (3), pp. 5–39.
dc.relation.references2. Gabriel L. F., Oreiro J. L. C., Jayme Jr. F. G. (2016). A North-South Model of Economic Growth, Technological Gap, Structural Change and Real Exchange Rate. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 38, pp. 83–94.
dc.relation.references3. Bell D. (1976) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. Basic Books, 616 p.
dc.relation.references4. Xiaosu Ye, Lie Ma, Kunhui Ye, Jiantao Chen, Qiu Xie (2017). Analysis of Regional Inequality from Sectoral Structure, Spatial Policy and Economic Development: A Case Study of Chongqing, China. Sustainability, Vol. 9(4), 633. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040633.
dc.relation.references5. Syrquin M. (2008). Structural change and development. International Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 1, 48 p.
dc.relation.references6. Cimoli M., Katz J. (2003). Structural reforms, technological gaps and economic development: A Latin American perspective. Industrial and corporate change, Vol. 12(2), pp. 387–411. doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.2.387
dc.relation.references7. Fagerberg J. (2000). Technological progress, structural change and productivity growth: A comparative study. Structural change and economic dynamics, Vol. 11(4), pp. 393–411. doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00025-4
dc.relation.references8. Dancygier R. M., Donnelly M. J. (2013). Sectoral Economies, Economic Contexts, and Attitudes toward Immigration. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 17–35. DOI:10.1017/S0022381612000849
dc.relation.references9. UNIDO. Industrial Development Report 2013, Sustaining Employment Growth: The Role of Manufacturing and Structural Change. URL: https://www.unido.org/
dc.relation.references10. Lee K., Lee J. (2020). National innovation system, economic complexity, and economic growth: country panel analysis using the US patent data. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 30. pp. 897–928.
dc.relation.references11. Pyroh O.V. (2014). Structural changes in the model of national economy of Ukraine under an influence of informatization of society. Effective economy, Vol. 7. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=3170.
dc.relation.references12. Pyroh O. V., Shpak N. O. (2020). Transformation of the Sectoral Model of Development in the Western Region of Ukraine in Conditions of Instability. Economy and State, Vol. 6, pp. 6–12.
dc.relation.references13. Pyroh O., Prokopenko M., Chernobay L., Kovalenko R., Papizh Yu., Syta Ye. (2021). Management of business processes and export-import activity of industrial enterprises in the digital economy. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Vol. 39, Is. 52021. DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i5.5204
dc.relation.references14. State Statistic Service of Ukraine data. URL: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/
dc.relation.references15. World bank data. URL: https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx
dc.relation.references16. Doroshkevych K., Shpak N., Dzvonyk R., Naichuk-Khrushch M., Dvulit Z., Shpak Yu. (2021). Evaluation of Tactical Approaches to the Implementation of the Strategy of Innovative IT Projects. International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, Vol. 2, 407 p.
dc.relation.references17. Oleksiv I., Lema H., Kharchuk V., Lisovych T., Dluhopolskyi O., Dluhopolska T. (2020). Identification of Stakeholders Importance for the Company’s Social Responsibility using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies, ACIT 2020 - Proceedings, pp. 573–576.
dc.relation.references18. Hartog M., Lopez-Cordova J.E., Neffke F. (2020). Assessing Ukraine’s Role in European Value Chains: A Gravity Equation-cum-Economic Complexity Analysis Approach. URL: https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/publications/assessing-ukraines-role-european-value-chains-gravity-equation-cum-economic.
dc.relation.references19. Metroverse. URL: https://metroverse.cid.harvard.edu/city/3351/overview?aggregation=industries
dc.relation.references20. Shpak N., Kulyniak I., Gvozd M., Vveinhardt J., Horbal N. (2021). Formulation of Development Strategies for Regional Agricultural Resource Potential: The Ukrainian Case. Resources, Vol. 10, 57 p.
dc.relation.referencesen1. Rodrik D. (2014). The Past, Present and Future of Economic Growth. Challenge, Vol. 57 (3), pp. 5–39 (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen2. Gabriel L. F., Oreiro J. L. C., Jayme Jr. F. G. (2016). A North-South Model of Economic Growth, Technological Gap, Structural Change and Real Exchange Rate. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 38, pp. 83–94 (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen3. Bell D. (1976). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. Basic Books, 616 p. (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen4. Xiaosu Ye., Lie Ma., Kunhui Ye., Jiantao Chen, Qiu Xie (2017). Analysis of Regional Inequality from Sectoral Structure, Spatial Policy and Economic Development: A Case Study of Chongqing, China. Sustainability, Vol. 9(4), 633. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040633 (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen5. Syrquin M. (2008). Structural change and development. International Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 1, 48 p. (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen6. Cimoli M., Katz J. (2003). Structural reforms, technological gaps and economic development: A Latin American perspective. Industrial and corporate change, Vol. 12(2), pp. 387–411. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.2.387 (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen7. Fagerberg J. (2000). Technological progress, structural change and productivity growth: A comparative study. Structural change and economic dynamics, Vol. 11(4), pp. 393-411. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00025-4 (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen8. Dancygier R. M., Donnelly M. J. (2013). Sectoral Economies, Economic Contexts, and Attitudes toward Immigration. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 17–35. DOI:10.1017/S0022381612000849 (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen9. UNIDO. Industrial Development Report 2013, Sustaining Employment Growth: The Role of Manufacturing and Structural Change. Retrieved from: https://www.unido.org/ (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen10. Lee K., Lee J. (2020). National innovation system, economic complexity, and economic growth: country panel analysis using the US patent data. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 30. pp. 897–928 (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen11. Pyroh O.V. (2014). Structural changes in the model of national economy of Ukraine under an influence of informatization of society. Effective economy, Vol. 7. Retrieved from: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=3170 (in Ukrainian)
dc.relation.referencesen12. Pyroh O.V., Shpak N.O. (2020). Transformation of the Sectoral Model of Development in the Western Region of Ukraine in Conditions of Instability. Economy and State, Vol. 6, pp. 6–12 (in Ukrainian).
dc.relation.referencesen13. Pyroh O., Prokopenko M., Chernobay L., Kovalenko R., Papizh Yu., Syta Ye. (2021). Management of business processes and export-import activity of industrial enterprises in the digital economy. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Vol. 39, Is. 52021. DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i5.5204 (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen14. State Statistic Service of Ukraine data. Retrieved from: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/ (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen15. World bank data. Retrieved from: https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen16. Doroshkevych K., Shpak N., Dzvonyk R., Naichuk-Khrushch M., Dvulit Z., Shpak Yu. (2021). Evaluation of Tactical Approaches to the Implementation of the Strategy of Innovative IT Projects. International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, Vol. 2, 407 p. (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen17. Oleksiv I., Lema H., Kharchuk V., Lisovych T., Dluhopolskyi O., Dluhopolska T. (2020). Identification of Stakeholders Importance for the Company’s Social Responsibility using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies, ACIT 2020 – Proceedings, pp. 573–576 (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen18. Hartog M., Lopez-Cordova J.E., Neffke F. (2020). Assessing Ukraine's Role in European Value Chains: A Gravity Equation-cum-Economic Complexity Analysis Approach. Retrieved from: https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/publications/assessing-ukraines-role-european-value-chains-gravity-equation-cum-economic. (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen19. Metroverse. Retrieved from: https://metroverse.cid.harvard.edu/city/3351/overview?aggregation=industries (in English).
dc.relation.referencesen20. Shpak N., Kulyniak I., Gvozd M., Vveinhardt J., Horbal N. (2021). Formulation of Development Strategies for Regional Agricultural Resource Potential: The Ukrainian Case. Resources, Vol. 10, 57 p. (in English).
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su9040633
dc.relation.urihttps://www.unido.org/
dc.relation.urihttp://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=3170
dc.relation.urihttps://ukrstat.gov.ua/
dc.relation.urihttps://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx
dc.relation.urihttps://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/publications/assessing-ukraines-role-european-value-chains-gravity-equation-cum-economic
dc.relation.urihttps://metroverse.cid.harvard.edu/city/3351/overview?aggregation=industries
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.2.387
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00025-4
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2022
dc.rights.holder© Пирог О. В., 2022
dc.subjectсекторна модель
dc.subjectекономічне зростання
dc.subjectнаціональна економіка
dc.subjectсільське господарство
dc.subjectпромисловість
dc.subjectпорівняльний аналіз країн
dc.subjectУкраїна
dc.subjectsectorial model
dc.subjecteconomic growth
dc.subjectnational economy
dc.subjectagriculture
dc.subjectindustry
dc.subjectcomparative studies of countries
dc.subjectUkraine
dc.subject.jelС53
dc.subject.jelF01
dc.subject.jelO14
dc.subject.jelO21
dc.subject.jelO47
dc.subject.jelO57
dc.subject.udc330.34
dc.titleFormation of sectorial model of Ukrainian economy at the post-war period
dc.title.alternativeФормування секторної моделі економіки України у поствоєнний період
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2022v6n2_Pyroh_O_V-Formation_of_sectorial_model_90-99.pdf
Size:
614.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2022v6n2_Pyroh_O_V-Formation_of_sectorial_model_90-99__COVER.png
Size:
431.42 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.76 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Вісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Проблеми економіки та управління. – 2022. – Том 6, № 2