Manipulating the brexit issue in the english-written media

Simple item page
dc.citation.epage109
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.journalTitleВісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Журналістські науки
dc.citation.spage99
dc.contributor.affiliationПриватне акціонерне товариство “ВНЗ МАУП”
dc.contributor.affiliationPrivate Joint-Stock Company “Higher Education Institution “Interregional Academy of Personnel Management”
dc.contributor.authorСушко, Сергій
dc.contributor.authorSushko, Serhii
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-04T11:40:02Z
dc.date.available2020-03-04T11:40:02Z
dc.date.created2019-02-26
dc.date.issued2019-02-26
dc.description.abstractРозглянуто провідні форми висвітлення у британських ЗМІ найгострішої проблеми Об’єднаного Королівства – виходу країни з Європейського Союзу, процесу, який отримав назву Brexit (“Британський вихід”). Різнобічність висвітлення Брекзиту виявляється у формах виваженого журналістського та академічного аналізу причин та обставин цього суспільно-політичного явища, демостративно заангажованого однобічного підходу з використанням зневажливо-образливого дискурсу і тону, що значною мірою характерно для британських таблоїдів, журналістського розслідування утаємничених засобів втручання у доленосний референдум країни у 2016 р., газетних та журнальних колонок, спрямованих виключно на Брекзит та закріплених за відомими огдядачами, блогів, сенсаційно-конспірологічних матеріалів, яким бракує доказової бази, інтерв’ю, публічних виступів, доповідей на конференціях. До результатів дослідження належить виокремлення зазначених форм та визначення особливостей і наявності або відсутності ознак маніпулятивності в окремих публікаціях, вибраних для аналізу; встановлення культурно та історично маркованої стратифікації друкованих видань британських ЗМІ; виокремлення вагомого шару антиманіпулятивних публікацій та внеску окремих журналістів-розслідувачів у справу забезпечення демократичного суспільного вибору; аналіз серії публікацій в авторських брекзит-колонках газети Guardian; окреслення формату публікацій окремих видань, зокрема суттєвої ролі заголовків на першій сторінці друкованих видань (за матеріалами огляду академічного дискурсу).
dc.description.abstractThe mass media exposure of its readership to the burning problems of nowadays, internationally or a country-confined, has always been questioned for a degree of manipulation involved. For the British people, the Brexit vote and its largely overlooked complications have been the most urgent national problem for which there is no immediate solution in the foreseeable future. The British press coverage of Brexit is a crucial agent in shaping the public and an individual’s stand to the Brexit issues. The research problem being dealt with in this paper is a multitude of journalistic views on Brexit and a scope and effect of counter-manipulative Brexit-related publications in the British press. The purpose of this research is to get a profile of The Guardian political columnists writing on the problems of Brexit as well as to analyse a couple of relevant counter-manipulative publications. We made use of the following methods: data collection methods – observation, survey, textual and content analysis, classification; qualitative and quantitative analysis; theoretical construction method. The results obtained show that the British mass media have been at their best to provide their audiences every possible angle, or nuance, of the formidable Brexit structure. In respect of Brexit vote, there is a cleat watershed between the two formative clusters of the British press. While the ‘prestige press’ (also known under the terms ‘broadsheet’ or ‘quality’ newspapers) – the Independent, Times, Guardian, Financial Times, Mirror and Telegraph – have been following the course of restrainedanalytical approach to tackling Brexit issues without antagonizing Leavers and Remainers, giving both sides their due in their argumentation, daily ‘popular’ and ‘working class’ newspapers in the UK –The Sun, Daily Mail, the Mirror and Express (categorized as tabloids) – systemically reproduce an openly hostile stand to the Remain platform of voters, openly and unrelentingly criticizing the EU as an international institution jeopardizing British sovereignty. It was ascertained that all the versatile techniques aimed at manipulating Brexit in press and other media, social networks included, have been effectively counteracted and exposed in academic research and investigative journalism. Conclusion. In this paper it has been ascertained that the readers of both categories – average readers who are not engaged professionally or otherwise in politics.
dc.format.extent99-109
dc.format.pages11
dc.identifier.citationSushko S. Manipulating the brexit issue in the english-written media / Serhii Sushko // Вісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Журналістські науки. — Львів : Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2019. — № 3. — С. 99–109.
dc.identifier.citationenSushko S. Manipulating the brexit issue in the english-written media / Serhii Sushko // Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Serie: Zhurnalistski nauky. — Lviv : Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky, 2019. — No 3. — P. 99–109.
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/46626
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherВидавництво Львівської політехніки
dc.relation.ispartofВісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Журналістські науки, 3, 2019
dc.relation.references1. Miura, Shintaro. Manipulated news model: Electoral competition and mass media https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/
dc.relation.references2. Berry, Mike. Understanding the role of the mass media in the EU Referendum. https://www.referendumanalysis.eu/eu-referendum-analysis-2016/section-1-context/understanding-the-role-of-the-mass-media-in-the-eu-referendum/
dc.relation.references3. Flynn, Paul. What Brexit should have taught us about voter manipulation.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/17/brexit-voter-manipulation-eu-referendum-social-media.
dc.relation.references4. The Liberty Beacon.https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/theliberty-beacon/
dc.relation.references5. Cadwalladr, Carole. My TED talk: how I took on the tech titans in their lair https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/apr/21/carole-cadwalladr-ted-tech-google-facebookzuckerberg-silicon-valley
dc.relation.references6. Gavin, Neil T. Media definitely do matter: Brexit, immigration, climate change and beyond. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1369148118799260
dc.relation.references7.”EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Early reflections from leading UK academics.”.Edited by: Daniel Jackson, Einar Thorsen and Dominic Wring.http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/24337/1/EU%20Referendum%20Analysis%202016%20-%20Jackson%20Thorsen%20and%20Wring%20v1.pdf
dc.relation.references8.Henley, Jon. Reporting on Brexit from Europe: ‘I’ll be mighty glad when it’s over’ https://www.theguardian.com/membership/2019/may/11/reporting-brexit-europe-france
dc.relation.references9. Henley, Jon.’Aren’t you going insane?’: readers’ questions from beyond Brexitland https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/18/arent-you-going-insane-readers-questions-from-beyond-brexitland
dc.relation.references10. Morrison, Alan. DYSBREXIA SYNDROME – Manipulation & Mayhem in the EU Referendum. http://www.europereloaded.com/dysbrexia-syndrome-manipulation-mayhem-eu-referendum/
dc.relation.references11. Dunayevska, Yu. Sushko, Serhii. The dichotomy of the ‘manipulative versus counter-manipulative impact’: does it exist in the English-written mass media texts on climate change?
dc.relation.references12. Meek, James. Brexit and Myths of Englishness.https://www.lrb.co.uk/v40/n19/james-meek/brexit-and-myths-of-englishness
dc.relation.references13. Dean, Alex. The worst thing about Brexit is that it will never end.https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/theworst-thing-about-brexit-is-that-it-will-never-end
dc.relation.references14. Nuccitelli, Dana. Rejection of experts spreads from Brexit to climate change with ‘Clexithttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-percent/2016/aug/08/rejection-of-experts-spreads-from-brexit-to-climate-change-with-clexit
dc.relation.references15. Ward, Bob. “Is there a link between climate change ‘sceptics’ and Brexit supporters? https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/tactics-of-climate-change-sceptics-and-vote-leave/
dc.relation.references16. Mandel, Kyla. Revealed: the climate science deniers behind the Brexit campaign https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/revealed-climate-science-deniers-behind-brexit-campaign/
dc.relation.references17. Buxbaum, Jessica. Do They Mean Us? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/brexit-eu-referendum-media-coveragepartisan-a8731051.html
dc.relation.references18. van Dijk, Teun A.Discourseandmanipulation [Електронний ресурс] / Teun A. Van Dijk // Discourse&Society – 2006. – Режим доступу: http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Discourse%20and%20manipulation.pdf
dc.relation.referencesen1. Miura, Shintaro. Manipulated news model: Electoral competition and mass media https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/
dc.relation.referencesen2. Berry, Mike. Understanding the role of the mass media in the EU Referendum. https://www.referendumanalysis.eu/eu-referendum-analysis-2016/section-1-context/understanding-the-role-of-the-mass-media-in-the-eu-referendum/
dc.relation.referencesen3. Flynn, Paul. What Brexit should have taught us about voter manipulation.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/17/brexit-voter-manipulation-eu-referendum-social-media.
dc.relation.referencesen4. The Liberty Beacon.https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/theliberty-beacon/
dc.relation.referencesen5. Cadwalladr, Carole. My TED talk: how I took on the tech titans in their lair https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/apr/21/carole-cadwalladr-ted-tech-google-facebookzuckerberg-silicon-valley
dc.relation.referencesen6. Gavin, Neil T. Media definitely do matter: Brexit, immigration, climate change and beyond. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1369148118799260
dc.relation.referencesen7."EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Early reflections from leading UK academics.".Edited by: Daniel Jackson, Einar Thorsen and Dominic Wring.http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/24337/1/EU%20Referendum%20Analysis%202016%20-%20Jackson%20Thorsen%20and%20Wring%20v1.pdf
dc.relation.referencesen8.Henley, Jon. Reporting on Brexit from Europe: ‘I’ll be mighty glad when it’s over’ https://www.theguardian.com/membership/2019/may/11/reporting-brexit-europe-france
dc.relation.referencesen9. Henley, Jon.’Aren’t you going insane?’: readers’ questions from beyond Brexitland https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/18/arent-you-going-insane-readers-questions-from-beyond-brexitland
dc.relation.referencesen10. Morrison, Alan. DYSBREXIA SYNDROME – Manipulation & Mayhem in the EU Referendum. http://www.europereloaded.com/dysbrexia-syndrome-manipulation-mayhem-eu-referendum/
dc.relation.referencesen11. Dunayevska, Yu. Sushko, Serhii. The dichotomy of the ‘manipulative versus counter-manipulative impact’: does it exist in the English-written mass media texts on climate change?
dc.relation.referencesen12. Meek, James. Brexit and Myths of Englishness.https://www.lrb.co.uk/v40/n19/james-meek/brexit-and-myths-of-englishness
dc.relation.referencesen13. Dean, Alex. The worst thing about Brexit is that it will never end.https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/theworst-thing-about-brexit-is-that-it-will-never-end
dc.relation.referencesen14. Nuccitelli, Dana. Rejection of experts spreads from Brexit to climate change with ‘Clexithttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-percent/2016/aug/08/rejection-of-experts-spreads-from-brexit-to-climate-change-with-clexit
dc.relation.referencesen15. Ward, Bob. "Is there a link between climate change ‘sceptics’ and Brexit supporters? https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/tactics-of-climate-change-sceptics-and-vote-leave/
dc.relation.referencesen16. Mandel, Kyla. Revealed: the climate science deniers behind the Brexit campaign https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/revealed-climate-science-deniers-behind-brexit-campaign/
dc.relation.referencesen17. Buxbaum, Jessica. Do They Mean Us? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/brexit-eu-referendum-media-coveragepartisan-a8731051.html
dc.relation.referencesen18. van Dijk, Teun A.Discourseandmanipulation [Electronic resource], Teun A. Van Dijk, Discourse&Society – 2006, Access mode: http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Discourse%20and%20manipulation.pdf
dc.relation.urihttps://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/
dc.relation.urihttps://www.referendumanalysis.eu/eu-referendum-analysis-2016/section-1-context/understanding-the-role-of-the-mass-media-in-the-eu-referendum/
dc.relation.urihttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/17/brexit-voter-manipulation-eu-referendum-social-media
dc.relation.urihttps://mediabiasfactcheck.com/theliberty-beacon/
dc.relation.urihttps://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/apr/21/carole-cadwalladr-ted-tech-google-facebookzuckerberg-silicon-valley
dc.relation.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1369148118799260
dc.relation.urihttp://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/24337/1/EU%20Referendum%20Analysis%202016%20-%20Jackson%20Thorsen%20and%20Wring%20v1.pdf
dc.relation.urihttps://www.theguardian.com/membership/2019/may/11/reporting-brexit-europe-france
dc.relation.urihttps://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/18/arent-you-going-insane-readers-questions-from-beyond-brexitland
dc.relation.urihttp://www.europereloaded.com/dysbrexia-syndrome-manipulation-mayhem-eu-referendum/
dc.relation.urihttps://www.lrb.co.uk/v40/n19/james-meek/brexit-and-myths-of-englishness
dc.relation.urihttps://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/theworst-thing-about-brexit-is-that-it-will-never-end
dc.relation.urihttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-percent/2016/aug/08/rejection-of-experts-spreads-from-brexit-to-climate-change-with-clexit
dc.relation.urihttps://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/tactics-of-climate-change-sceptics-and-vote-leave/
dc.relation.urihttps://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/revealed-climate-science-deniers-behind-brexit-campaign/
dc.relation.urihttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/brexit-eu-referendum-media-coveragepartisan-a8731051.html
dc.relation.urihttp://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Discourse%20and%20manipulation.pdf
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2019
dc.rights.holder© Sushko Serhii, 2019
dc.subjectмедіа
dc.subjectманіпуляція
dc.subjectБрекзит
dc.subjectmedia
dc.subjectmanipulating
dc.subjectthe Brexit
dc.subject.udc070(=111)-026.39
dc.subject.udc[32(410)-027.6-043.65
dc.subject.udc061.1ЄС]
dc.titleManipulating the brexit issue in the english-written media
dc.title.alternativeМаніпулювання проблематикою Брекзиту в англомовних ЗМІ
dc.typeArticle

Files

License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.96 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Вісник Національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. Серія: Журналістські науки. – 2019. – Випуск 3