Застосування технології blockchain для захисту та менеджменту геопросторових даних

Simple item page
dc.citation.epage34
dc.citation.journalTitleСучасні досягнення геодезичної науки та виробництва
dc.citation.spage28
dc.citation.volumeІІ (42)
dc.contributor.affiliationНаціональний університет “Львівська політехніка”
dc.contributor.affiliationЗахідне геодезичне товариство УТГК
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.contributor.affiliationWestern Geodetic Society UTGC
dc.contributor.authorЧетверіков, Б.
dc.contributor.authorКілару, В.
dc.contributor.authorChetverikov, B.
dc.contributor.authorKilaru, V.
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-19T09:49:21Z
dc.date.available2023-06-19T09:49:21Z
dc.date.created2021-06-22
dc.date.issued2021-06-22
dc.description.abstractМетою роботи є аналіз суті системи блокчейн та його архітектури, застосування цієї системи для менеджменту геопросторових даних, для вирішення завдань картографування та землеустрою. Унікальність застосування блокчейн-технологій виключає фальсифікацію інформації в електронних реєстрах за рахунок зберігання інформації “блоками”. У системи немає єдиного місця зберігання даних. Реєстр даних зберігається одночасно у всіх учасників системи й одночасно оновлюється у разі змін, що зводить до мінімуму ризики втрати інформації. Сьогодні простежується така світова тенденція, як використання технології блокчейн у різних галузях, адже вона впливає на більшість галузей промисловості. Ми маємо можливість використовувати технологію блокчейн від звичних нам банківських операцій до фінансів і нерухомості реального часу. Сьогодні ця тенденція інтегрується і в інші виробництва, які активно розвивають і впроваджують численні стартапи. Можна із впевненістю сказати, що блокчейн творить революцію і нині його можна зіставити з геніальним винаходом XX століття – інтернетом. Ця технологія дає нам абсолютно новий підхід до зберігання інформації та проведення операцій із встановленням trust rules. Завдяки цьому технологія стає придатнішою, адже її вимоги характеризуються високим ступенем безпеки.
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the work is to analyze the essence of the blockchain system and its architecture. Application of this system for geospatial data management, for solving mapping and land management. The uniqueness of the use of blockchain technologies eliminates the falsification of information in electronic registers by storing information “blocks”. The system does not have a single storage location. The data register is stored simultaneously for all participants in the system and is simultaneously updated with changes, which minimizes the risk of information loss. At the moment, we can trace such a global trend as the use of blockchain technology in various industries, because it affects most industries. We have the opportunity to use blockchain technology from our usual banking operations to real-time finance and real estate. Today, this trend integrates into other industries, which are actively developing and implementing numerous startups. It is safe to say that the blockchain is creating a revolution and today it can be compared with the ingenious invention of the XX century – the Internet. This technology gives us a completely new, different approach to storing information and conducting transactions by establishing trust rules. Due to this, this technology becomes more suitable because it has requirements with a high degree of security.
dc.format.extent28-34
dc.format.pages7
dc.identifier.citationЧетверіков Б. Застосування технології blockchain для захисту та менеджменту геопросторових даних / Б. Четверіков, В. Кілару // Сучасні досягнення геодезичної науки та виробництва. — Львів : Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2021. — Том ІІ (42). — С. 28–34.
dc.identifier.citationenChetverikov B. Application of blockchain technology for geospatial data protection and management / B. Chetverikov, V. Kilaru // Modern Achievements of Geodesic Science and Industry. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2021. — Vol II (42). — P. 28–34.
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/59241
dc.language.isouk
dc.publisherВидавництво Львівської політехніки
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofСучасні досягнення геодезичної науки та виробництва, 2021
dc.relation.ispartofModern Achievements of Geodesic Science and Industry, 2021
dc.relation.referencesMa N., Wang X., Li Z., Zhan P., He X., Zhang X., & Liu Z.
dc.relation.references(2019). Design of Routing Incentive Protocol for
dc.relation.referencesSpace Network Based on Blockchain Technology. In
dc.relation.referencesA. N. Shiryaev, Probability-2, Vol. 95, 123–131.
dc.relation.referencesURL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6553-9_14.
dc.relation.referencesKamel Boulos M. N., Wilson J. T., & Clauson K. A.
dc.relation.references(2018). Geospatial blockchain: promises, challenges,
dc.relation.referencesand scenarios in health and healthcare. International
dc.relation.referencesJournal of Health Geographics, 17(1), 25, s12942-018-0144–x. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-018-0144-x.
dc.relation.referencesBennett R. M., Pickering M., &Sargent J. (2019).
dc.relation.referencesTransformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global
dc.relation.referencesreview of the uptake and impact of NoSQL,
dc.relation.referencesblockchain, and big data analytics on the land
dc.relation.referencesadministration sector. Land Use Policy, 83, 435–448.
dc.relation.referencesURL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.016.
dc.relation.referencesLynch S. (2018). OpenLitterMap.com – Open Data on
dc.relation.referencesPlastic Pollution with Blockchain Rewards (Littercoin).
dc.relation.referencesOpen Geospatial Data, Software and Standards, 3(1), 6. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-018-0050-y.
dc.relation.referencesTurk Ž., Klinc R. (2017). Potentials of blockchain
dc.relation.referencestechnology for construction management // Creative
dc.relation.referencesconstruction conference. – Primosten, 638–645.
dc.relation.referencesDOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052
dc.relation.referencesBennett S. (2017). Blockchain: a Guide to Understanding
dc.relation.referencesBlockchain (the Cryptomasher Series) Cryptomasher
dc.relation.referencesvia PublishDrive, 54 p. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=bbZEDwAAQBAJ&dq=blockchain&hl=ru&source=gbs_navlinks_s.
dc.relation.referencesSajid A.; Abbas H.; Saleem K. (2016). Cloud-assisted iotbased scada systems security: A review of the state
dc.relation.referencesof the art and future challenges. IEEE Acc. 4, 1375–1384.
dc.relation.referencesNi J., Zhang K., Lin X., Shen X. (2017). Securing fog
dc.relation.referencescomputing for internet of things applications:
dc.relation.referencesChallenges and solutions. IEEE Commun. Surv.
dc.relation.referencesTutor., 20, 601–628.
dc.relation.referencesZeng X., Garg S., Strazdins P., Jayaraman P.,
dc.relation.referencesGeorgakopoulos D., Ranjan, R. (2017). IOTSim: A
dc.relation.referencessimulator for analysing IoT applications. J. Syst.
dc.relation.referencesArchit., 72, 93–107.
dc.relation.referencesLiang K., Zhao L., Chu X., Chen, H. H. (2017). An
dc.relation.referencesintegrated architecture for software defined and
dc.relation.referencesvirtualized radio access networks with fog
dc.relation.referencescomputing. IEEE Netw., 31, 80–87.
dc.relation.referencesJogunola O., Ikpehai A., Anoh K., Adebisi B.,
dc.relation.referencesHammoudeh M., Gacanin H., Harris G. (2018).
dc.relation.referencesComparative Analysis of P2P Architectures for
dc.relation.referencesEnergy Trading and Sharing. Energies, 11, 62.
dc.relation.referencesBaig Z. A., Szewczyk P., Valli C., Rabadia P., Hannay P.,
dc.relation.referencesChernyshev M., Johnstone M., Kerai P., Ibrahim A.,
dc.relation.referencesSansurooah K. et al. (2017). Future challenges for
dc.relation.referencessmart cities: Cyber-security and digital forensics.
dc.relation.referencesDigit. Investig., 22, 3–13.
dc.relation.referencesDaneva M., Lazarov B. (2018). Requirements for smart
dc.relation.referencescities: Results from a systematic review of literature.
dc.relation.referencesIn Proceedings of the 2018 12th International
dc.relation.referencesConference on Research Challenges in Information
dc.relation.referencesScience (RCIS), Nantes, France, 29–31 May 2018; 1–6.
dc.relation.referencesSamaniego M., Deters R. (2016). Blockchain as a Service
dc.relation.referencesfor IoT. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International
dc.relation.referencesConference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE
dc.relation.referencesGreen Computing and Communications (GreenCom)
dc.relation.referencesand IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing
dc.relation.references(CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData),
dc.relation.referencesChengdu, China, 15–18 December 2016; 433–436.
dc.relation.referencesSharma P. K., Park J. H. (2018). Blockchain based hybrid
dc.relation.referencesnetwork architecture for the smart city. Future
dc.relation.referencesGener.Comput. Syst., 86, 650–655
dc.relation.referencesMendez Mena D. M.; Yang B. (2018). Blockchain-Based
dc.relation.referencesWhitelisting for Consumer IoT Devices and Home
dc.relation.referencesNetworks. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIG
dc.relation.referencesConference on Information Technology Education.
dc.relation.referencesInternational World WideWeb Conferences Steering
dc.relation.referencesCommittee, Lyon, France, 23–27 April 2018; 7–12.
dc.relation.referencesBrown M. E. (2015). Satellite remote sensing in agriculture
dc.relation.referencesand food security assessment. Procedia Environ. Sci. 29:307. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.278
dc.relation.referencesBabich V., and Hilary G. (2018). Distributed ledgers and
dc.relation.referencesoperations: what operations management researchers
dc.relation.referencesshould know about blockchain technology. Manuf.
dc.relation.referencesServ. Oper. Manag. (forthcoming) (in press). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3131250
dc.relation.referencesBrown M. E. (2015). Satellite remote sensing in agriculture
dc.relation.referencesand food security assessment. Procedia Environ. Sci. 29:307. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.278
dc.relation.referencesChod J., Trichakis N., Tsoukalas G., Aspegren H., and
dc.relation.referencesWeber M. (2019). On the financing benefits of supply
dc.relation.referenceschain transparency and blockchain adoption. Manag.
dc.relation.referencesSci. (forthcoming) (in press). doi: 10.2139/ssrn. 3078945
dc.relation.referencesDalhaus T., Musshoff O., and Finger R. (2018). Phenology
dc.relation.referencesinformation contributes to reduce temporal basis risk
dc.relation.referencesin agricultural weather index insurance. Sci. Rep. 8:46.
dc.relation.referencesdoi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18656-5
dc.relation.referencesHileman G., Rauchs M. (2017). Global blockchain
dc.relation.referencesbenchmarking study. Cambridge: Cambridge Centre
dc.relation.referencesfor Alternative Finance, 119.
dc.relation.referencesAppelbaum D., Nehmer R. (2017). Designing and auditing
dc.relation.referencesaccounting systems based on blockchain and distributed
dc.relation.referencesledger principles. Feliciano School of Business.
dc.relation.referencesAccess mode: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/edc2/4c3ae8cb7f4f978c9353d47986168265fe03.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesCondos J., Sorrell W. H., Donegan S. L. Blockchain
dc.relation.referencestechnology: Opportunities and risks. Access mode :
dc.relation.referenceshttps://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/LegislativeReports/blockchain-technology-report-final.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesenMa, N., Wang, X., Li, Z.,Zhan, P., He, X., Zhang, X., & Liu, Z. (2019). Design of Routing Incentive Protocol for Space
dc.relation.referencesenNetwork Based on Blockchain Technology. In A. N. Shiryaev, Probability-2, Vol. 95, 123–131.
dc.relation.referencesenhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6553-9_14.
dc.relation.referencesenKamel Boulos, M. N., Wilson, J. T., & Clauson, K. A. (2018). Geospatial blockchain: promises, challenges, and
dc.relation.referencesenscenarios in health and healthcare. International Journal of Health Geographics, 17(1), 25, s12942-018-0144–x.
dc.relation.referencesenhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-018-0144-x.
dc.relation.referencesenBennett, R. M., Pickering, M., &Sargent, J. (2019). Transformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global review of the
dc.relation.referencesenuptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big data analytics on the land administration sector. Land Use
dc.relation.referencesenPolicy, 83, 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.016.
dc.relation.referencesenLynch, S. (2018). OpenLitterMap.com – Open Data on Plastic Pollution with Blockchain Rewards (Littercoin). Open
dc.relation.referencesenGeospatial Data, Software and Standards, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-018-0050-y.
dc.relation.referencesenTurk Ž., Klinc R. (2017). Potentials of blockchain technology for construction management // Creative construction
dc.relation.referencesenconference. Primosten, 638–645. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052
dc.relation.referencesenBennett S. (2017). Blockchain: a Guide to Understanding Blockchain (the Cryptomasher Series) Cryptomasher via
dc.relation.referencesenPublishDrive, 54. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=bbZEDwAAQBAJ&dq=blockchain&hl=ru&source=gbs_navlinks_s.
dc.relation.referencesenSajid, A.; Abbas, H.; Saleem, K. Cloud-assisted iot-based scada systems security: A review of the state of the art and
dc.relation.referencesenfuture challenges. IEEE Acc. 2016, 4, 1375–1384
dc.relation.referencesenNi, J.; Zhang, K.; Lin, X.; Shen, X. (2017). Securing fog computing for internet of things applications: Challenges and
dc.relation.referencesensolutions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 20, 601–628.
dc.relation.referencesenZeng, X.; Garg, S.; Strazdins, P.; Jayaraman, P.; Georgakopoulos, D.; Ranjan, R. (2017). IOTSim: A simulator for
dc.relation.referencesenanalysing IoT applications. J. Syst. Archit., 72, 93–107.
dc.relation.referencesenLiang, K.; Zhao, L.; Chu, X.; Chen, H. H. (2017) An integrated architecture for software defined and virtualized radio
dc.relation.referencesenaccess networks with fog computing. IEEE Netw., 31, 80–87.
dc.relation.referencesenJogunola, O.; Ikpehai, A.; Anoh, K.; Adebisi, B.; Hammoudeh, M.; Gacanin, H.; Harris, G. (2018). Comparative
dc.relation.referencesenAnalysis of P2P Architectures for Energy Trading and Sharing. Energies, 11, 62
dc.relation.referencesenBaig, Z. A.; Szewczyk, P.; Valli, C.; Rabadia, P.; Hannay, P.; Chernyshev, M.; Johnstone, M.; Kerai, P.; Ibrahim, A.;
dc.relation.referencesenSansurooah, K.; et al. (2017). Future challenges for smart cities: Cyber-security and digital forensics. Digit.
dc.relation.referencesenInvestig., 22, 3–13.
dc.relation.referencesenDaneva, M.; Lazarov, B. (2018). Requirements for smart cities: Results from a systematic review of literature. In
dc.relation.referencesenProceedings of the 2018 12th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS),
dc.relation.referencesenNantes, France, 29–31 May 2018; p. 1–6.
dc.relation.referencesenSamaniego, M.; Deters, R. (2016). Blockchain as a Service for IoT. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International
dc.relation.referencesenConference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom)
dc.relation.referencesenand IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), Chengdu,
dc.relation.referencesenChina, 15–18 December 2016; p. 433–436.
dc.relation.referencesenSharma, P. K.; Park, J. H. (2018). Blockchain based hybrid network architecture for the smart city. Future
dc.relation.referencesenGener.Comput. Syst., 86, 650–655
dc.relation.referencesenMendez Mena, D. M.; Yang, B. (2018). Blockchain-Based Whitelisting for Consumer IoT Devices and Home Networks.
dc.relation.referencesenIn Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education. International World
dc.relation.referencesenWideWeb Conferences Steering Committee, Lyon, France, 23–27 April 2018; 7–12.
dc.relation.referencesenBrown, M. E. (2015). Satellite remote sensing in agriculture and food security assessment. Procedia Environ. Sci. 29:307. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.278
dc.relation.referencesenBabich, V., and Hilary, G. (2018). Distributed ledgers and operations: what operations management researchers should
dc.relation.referencesenknow about blockchain technology. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. (forthcoming) (in press). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3131250
dc.relation.referencesenBrown, M. E. (2015). Satellite remote sensing in agriculture and food security assessment. Procedia Environ. Sci. 29:307. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.278
dc.relation.referencesenChod, J., Trichakis, N., Tsoukalas, G., Aspegren, H., and Weber, M. (2019). On the financing benefits of supply chain
dc.relation.referencesentransparency and blockchain adoption. Manag. Sci. (forthcoming) (in press). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3078945
dc.relation.referencesenDalhaus, T., Musshoff, O., and Finger, R. (2018). Phenology information contributes to reduce temporal basis risk in
dc.relation.referencesenagricultural weather index insurance. Sci. Rep., 8:46. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18656-5
dc.relation.referencesenHileman G., Rauchs M. (2017). Global blockchain benchmarking study. Cambridge: Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, 119.
dc.relation.referencesenAppelbaum D., Nehmer R. (2017). Designing and auditing accounting systems based on blockchain and distributed
dc.relation.referencesenledger principles. Feliciano School of Business. Access mode: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/edc2/4c3ae8cb7f4f978c9353d47986168265fe03.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesenCondos J., Sorrell W. H., Donegan S. L. Blockchain technology: Opportunities and risks. Access mode :
dc.relation.referencesenhttps://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/Legislative-Reports/blockchain-technology-report-final.pdf.
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6553-9_14
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-018-0144-x
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.016
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-018-0050-y
dc.relation.urihttps://books.google.ru/books?id=bbZEDwAAQBAJ&dq=blockchain&hl=ru&source=gbs_navlinks_s
dc.relation.urihttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/edc2/4c3ae8cb7f4f978c9353d47986168265fe03.pdf
dc.relation.urihttps://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/LegislativeReports/blockchain-technology-report-final.pdf
dc.relation.urihttps://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/Legislative-Reports/blockchain-technology-report-final.pdf
dc.rights.holder© Західне геодезичне товариство, 2021
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2021
dc.subjectблокчейн
dc.subjectцифрові транзакції
dc.subjectбаза даних
dc.subjectавтоматизація
dc.subjectзахист даних
dc.subjectblockchain
dc.subjectdigital transactions
dc.subjectdatabase
dc.subjectautomation
dc.subjectdata protection
dc.subject.udc528.92
dc.titleЗастосування технології blockchain для захисту та менеджменту геопросторових даних
dc.title.alternativeApplication of blockchain technology for geospatial data protection and management
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021vII__42__Chetverikov_B-Application_of_blockchain_28-34.pdf
Size:
808.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021vII__42__Chetverikov_B-Application_of_blockchain_28-34__COVER.png
Size:
1.4 MB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.8 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Сучасні досягнення геодезичної науки та виробництва. – 2021. – Випуск 2 (42)