Менеджмент та підприємництво в Україні: етапи становлення і проблеми розвитку. – 2016. – №851
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/37287
Вісник Національного університету "Львівська політехніка".
До збірника науково-прикладних праць “Менеджмент та підприємництво в України: етапи становлення і проблеми розвитку” увійшли статті, які відображають проблеми менеджменту, підприємництва, інвестиційної та інноваційної діяльності, управління національною економікою України тощо. Для працівників підприємств, банків, інвестиційних та інноваційних структур, органів державного управління, викладачів вищих навчальних закладів, науковців, аспірантів та студентів економічних спеціальностей.
Вісник Національного університету "Львівська політехніка". Серія: Менеджмент та підприємництво в Україні: етапи становлення і проблеми розвитку : збірник наукових праць / Міністерство освіти і науки України, Національний університет "Львівська політехніка" ; голова редакційно-видавничої ради Н. І. Чухрай. – Львів : Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2016. – № 851. – 224 с. : іл.
Browse
Search Results
Item Міжнародна конкурентоспроможність аграрного сектору України: теоретичний базис і проблеми розвитку(Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2016) Мустафаєва, Л. А.; Босак, А. О.Визначено основні фактори конкурентоспроможності аграрної продукції вітчизняних підприємств на міжнародному ринку. Враховано основні положення класичних і неокласичних теорій міжнародної торгівлі щодо визначення конкурентних переваг аграрного сектору. На основі відкритих статистичних джерел проаналізовано тенденції і динаміку виробництва та експорту сільськогосподарських культур та визначено основні напрямки розвитку галузі з урахуванням чинників внутрішньорегіонального і глобального впливу. Сформовано пропозиції щодо удосконалення системи підготовки спеціалістів аграрного сектору та реформування системи державного управління галуззю. Place in global market and role in international division of labor is important for every national economy. An important element of development of the country is structure of public production sector, through which the economy is gaining new capacities and expanding its operation prospects in the international market. Overall, the national economy is defined as a single integrated system of relationships between economic actors, a set of economic sectors and industries aimed at improving the welfare of the population. Currently, the agricultural sector of Ukraine is the main source of foreign currency earnings through the export of agricultural products. This situation is caused by the drop in production in steel and chemical industries, which traditionally were leaders of exports. The development of agriculture in Ukraine is spontaneous and export growth is based purely on price competition. In order for domestic producers of agricultural products to be competitive in the global market in the long term, new technologies should be developed, but also the conceptual basis of the industry at the state level should be created. The relevance of the study follows from the need to develop the theoretical basis of the strategic concept of agricultural development in Ukraine, and creation of effective tools to protect the domestic market and the expansion of its own agricultural products on the global market. To determine the factors of the international competitiveness of agricultural sector of Ukraine, in the article the following objectives have been achieved: studied international competitiveness theory and international trade theory; studied the factors shaping the international competitiveness of the products of the agricultural sector and evaluated their impact in terms of Ukraine; conducted a statistical analysis of production and export of agricultural products in Ukraine in terms of areas and product groups; formed directions of agricultural sector of Ukraine and identified the strengths and weaknesses of its export potential. Agriculture is the traditional manufacturing sector and, therefore, best meets the laws of classical political economy, a huge contribution to the development of which have been made by Karl Heinrich Marx, David Ricardo, Adam Smith, A. Marshall, John Stuart Mill, William Petty, François Quesnay, and others. They proclaimed the idea of natural order and the effect of economic laws. Important contributions to the formation of theoretical basis of the international competitiveness of the agricultural products also have been made by John Maynard Keynes, Joseph Alois Schumpeter, Michael E. Porter, Sir John Richard Hicks, Paul Anthony Samuelson. Although Ukraine is one of the world's largest producers and exporters of agricultural products, agricultural sector may face significant challenges in the further development due to the decline of its own machinery, lack of technical innovation, financial resources and more. The impact of various negative factors on the agricultural sector of Ukraine stimulates the search for alternative solutions aimed at eliminating the problems. For solving the problem of increasing competitiveness of the agricultural products in domestic and foreign markets, it is needed to develop a strategy of balanced development of agricultural enterprises, which will focus on the production of innovative high quality products. In particular: encouraging foreign investors, implementing new production technologies and upgrading material and technical bases, reducing the regulatory pressure on the agricultural sector, preserving tax benefits and monitoring their provision, amalgamating or eliminating inefficient companies, focus on world prices, solving the logistics problem, searching for and developing new markets, improving the competitiveness of small and medium-sized farms, improving the system of training specialists and so on.Item Сутність і структура інтелектуального капіталу підприємств(Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2016) Прокопенко, І. В.; Босак, А. О.Визначено сутнісні ознаки інтелектуального капіталу та описано різні типології його структурних елементів. У хронологічному порядку досліджено еволюцію та особливості формування терміна “інтелектуальний капітал” і суміжних до нього понять (нематеріальні активи, інтелектуальні активи, знання, капітал). Сформовано співвідношення понять і взаємозв’язків структурних елементів інтелектуального капіталу. Проаналізовано підходи до формування структури інтелектуального капіталу (структурний, функціональний і термінологічний), виявлено принципові розбіжності у трактуванні змістовного наповнення його складових та їх елементів. Intellectual capital (IC) has many different interpretations and ambiguities in defining its essential features, structure and properties. With increasing popularity of the IC management concept, many speculations on this topic appeared. Much businesses, begun racing one another to offer their services of evaluation of IC value, intangible assets, and companies' brands and trademarks while using mostly intuitive, and somewhere amateur or even fraudulent methods. For need of IC evaluation and its commercialization, it is critically important to clearly identify its components and describe their content. Further this typology will allow forming the system of IC evaluation indicators and methods of its regulation. In order to specify the concept of IC and formalize its structural elements, in this article are completed next tasks: examined existed definitions of IC and discovered their essential features; examined related to the IC concepts and identified their essential features in order to clearly differentiate them from IC; built a model of intercommunications of IC essential features and related to IC concepts; analyzed IC structural elements by various authors’ approaches and formed an own typology of these elements; formalized the description of IC structured elements. In the article are analyzed essential features of “intangible assets”, “intelligence”, “intellectual assets”, “intellectual property”, “knowledge”, and “capital” concepts. Based on comparative analysis of essential features, methods and context of these terms usage, their relation to IC has been established and a model of connections among separate essential features of described terms has been developed. When analyzing works of prominent experts in the IC field, two positions regarding correlation between “intellectual capital” and “intellectual assets” concepts clearly stand out. Many scientists who stood near origins of IC identification and management equate IC with intellectual and intangible assets (Karl-Erik Sveiby, J. H. Daum, Leif Edvinsson, Michael S. Malone, Annie Brooking) as these terms denote all intangible an organization has. Instead, other authors (Thomas A. Stewart, Michael Armstrong, A. V. Kendyukhov, W. Barancheev, O. M. Kolot) separate intellectual assets from intellectual capital, arguing that capital can be interpreted as ownership of assets and it is a higher form of economic performance than assets. More than 40 definitions of IC are reviewed in this article and the main essential feature has been selected for each of those definitions, which if examined, can fully explain content enclosed in the definition by author. There have been discovered only three of such essential features: intangible assets, knowledge and information, and intellectual resources. According to results of conducted research and own vision of current state and development prospects of IC, we believe that this term can be fully defined from structuralfunctional approach point of view. IC is a result of intellectual work in form of intellectual resources and intellectual products, values of which can create additional value through commercialization of structural, consumer, and human capitals. IC structure is a subject of controversy among many experts, but most of them agree to the fact that there are three related elements: structural, consumer, and human capitals. However, content and accentuation significantly varies from one researcher to another. This article carries out comparative analysis of various structural elements of IC and describes key trends of their development, and contradictions of its contextual content.